We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is it ok to let HBOS go under
Comments
-
Scotlands favourite bussiness man springs to mind:Tkennyboy66 wrote: »Hindsight is a great thing but HBOS would have been better left to go into administration with government guarantee. It could have been the "bad bank" into which all the toxic !!!!! was dumped.
Interesting that almost all the £10bn losses came from commercial lending rather than mortgage lending.0 -
When will everyone realise (especially Broken Hearted) that the government will NOT allow any banks to go under as this would create massive 'panic' and de-stabalise the economy further.
The government will not allow ANY bank to go under, this is fact, they would nationalise them before they went under.
There are alot of very good staff within the banking industry, and we as much as anyone else do not want to see people lose their money.I am an Honest Banker, giving honest advice to honest customers each day, we're all trying to make an honest living.:A0 -
Yes the banks are a special case, they were the ones who caused this mess and they will never loose out because we the tax payer will have to bail them out and pay there nice bonuses. They should be scrapped straight away
I am sure there are many good staff in banking as indeed many other sectors. But I dont believe employees/CEO's deserve bonuses, that is one reason why we are in the mess we are now as it encourages some to take high risks0 -
Yes the banks are a special case, they were the ones who caused this mess and they will never loose out because we the tax payer will have to bail them out and pay there nice bonuses. They should be scrapped straight away
I am sure there are many good staff in banking as indeed many other sectors. But I dont believe employees/CEO's deserve bonuses, that is one reason why we are in the mess we are now as it encourages some to take high risks
Some bonuses create those high risks.
LBG got it in the neck for trying to pay lower paid staff £120m in bonuses. LBG stated that this was generally lower than £2k bonuses. I don't carry out any excess risks but contribute to my businesses (and local departments) profits and can achieve a 9% bonus, which is higher than the £2k that LBG wanted to pay their staff.
It's my understanding that these staff may have contirbuted well to their local profits but the bank made losses due to the investment banking areas. Theres no indication that those getting bonuses were mortgage advisors either so these may be your average joe taking the cash through the window at your local branch, not those taking excessive risks.
I still think that the government have got a decent long term investment which should appreciate in value for them. Don't forget that LBG will be paying them interest this year on their preference shares too. I think it was 7% at an investment of £4bn adding £280m to government coffers if they aren't converted.0 -
I have always wondered if a Major mortgage bank went under, surely that would cause a huge property crash. How would the people with NE get mortgages with a new mortgage company as they would not have any equity and would probably not be able to raise a new deposit.Honest_Banker wrote: »The government will not allow ANY bank to go under, this is fact, they would nationalise them before they went under.0 -
sounds good to me.pickles110564 wrote: »I have always wondered if a Major mortgage bank went under, surely that would cause a huge property crash. t.0 -
-
HBOS does not really exist anymore. Halifax and Bank of Scotland are trading names within the Lloyds Banking Group. (there is some legal stuff to make this happen officially but it is already shown this way on the LBG website)
I think LBG want to get shot of the 'HBOS' name as soon as possible.0 -
HBOS does not really exist anymore. Halifax and Bank of Scotland are trading names within the Lloyds Banking Group. (there is some legal stuff to make this happen officially but it is already shown this way on the LBG website)
I think LBG want to get shot of the 'HBOS' name as soon as possible.
So glad I sold my Halifax freebies on the first day at £7.60, many moons ago.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards