We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
UK News article filters out £16.3 Trillion number
Comments
-
They didnt remove the 16.3 trillion out of the URL tho did they! Ha ha ha!0
-
So what did they remove and why?
How much can they filter these days? We have a right to know the truth, even if it causes mass panic and looting. We may come to that anyway by the sound of it.0 -
Sorry but if it was filltered they would filter the URL as well?
How do we not know they just changed the heading as it was a guess or just plain wrong.
I dont think the UK would filter EU news and for sure another country would print it anyway.0 -
Depends on the source of the leaked document and how damaging the data is....
those figures if officially sourced could trash the forex market.
http://www.dnotice.org.uk/faqs.htm#system
I wouldn't mind betting in light of the financial crisis, there is some form of gentlemens' agreement between the press and the treasury/boe.... except this time the Telegraph want to be a little cheeky and know exactly what they are doing by leaving the URL in there... as others on the net have commented, once it has been Digged, the URL isnt going to dissapear anyway. I dont think this is particularly conspiratorial; I just think that something that could cause a little bit more than carnage was accidentally leaked and an overenthusiastic journalist pressed publish too quickly.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards