We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Inflationary Holocaust - Jim Rogers
Comments
-
HelpWhereIcan wrote: »I remember reading somewhere that the Chinese save more and are less indebted than anyone.
Could not find th actual document but a quick google found
http://mises.org/story/3293#_edn8
Their GDP was tiny though. Even if they were saving 30% of income, incomes were tiny for a long time.0 -
HelpWhereIcan wrote: »I remember reading somewhere that the Chinese save more and are less indebted than anyone.
Could not find th actual document but a quick google found
http://mises.org/story/3293#_edn8
I always thought that they were heavy gamblers, not conducive to saving I would have thought'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I can't believe there are people on here argueing about a word, !!!!!! grow up.
Like a load of b i t c h ing school children.
as for posters saying "it reminds me of millions of jews etc" thats your thought its not all of ours.0 -
Yeah the One Child policy is sitting there silently creating a generation of 4 grandparents trying to live off a couple who are trying to raise their own child. It is a disaster waiting to happen.
I think it was brought in in 1979. So almost all the parents will be 65, 45 years after that which is <counts fingers and toes>2024</counts fingers and toes>.
I don't know much about Chinese pension schemes but I doubt the state put much away from the production of the collectivised peasantry for future years.
It might make an interesting sweepstake. How many years after 2024 will the wheels fall off the Chinese economy?
If grandparents are in decent health they can still work and benefit the economy.
It could be argued that economies are built from the bottom up (food, resources e.t.c.), not top down (number of people).0 -
leveller2911 wrote: »I can't believe there are people on here argueing about a word, !!!!!! grow up.
Like a load of b i t c h ing school children.
Hey, go and play round your own street..:p0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards