We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buy to let Fraud (British subprime) - More collapse
Comments
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I could show proof that some areas are still at 2007 levels
So the rest of the UK is set for a further -50% to -80% crash in the depression, but Aberdeen will stick at 2007 prices.
Yeah... Aberdeen is really going to stick at 2007 prices as the rest of the UK, and world, suffer in a massive house price crash.0 -
-
So the rest of the UK is set for a further -50% to -80% crash in the depression, but Aberdeen will stick at 2007 prices.
Yeah... Aberdeen is really going to stick at 2007 prices as the rest of the UK, and world, suffer in a massive house price crash.
Yawn, open your eyes and read what I said dopester
I do not advicate that Aberdeen (incidently, I never mentioned Aberdeen in this thread, lose the fixation mate) or Scotland will not drop below 2007 levels.IveSeenTheLight wrote:I'm not denying that house prices may fall below 2007 levels, however I am disagreeing with the statement that properties are already at 2004 levels.
I merely said that some areas currently are at 2007 levels and not as per the UK average 2004 people quote as gospel
P.S. -50% to -80% :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Wibble Wibble
<Cuckoo Cuckoo>:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
amcluesent wrote: »> Simon Morris the director has been arrested for fraud<
He's obviously a well dodgy geezer. Eyes are so close together! Caveat emptor(*)
(*) For those who went to comprehensive schools, that means "buyer beware".
I went to a Comprehensive and understood.
Hic Amulescent argumentum interfectus est.Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith0 -
How much more evidence does the government need before it outlaws the dishonest sleazy buy to let business?Krusty & Phil Madoff, 1990 - 2007:
"Buy now because house prices only ever go UP, UP, UP."0 -
you would have to be lacking your senses if you invest in the kind of property i saw in one the previous posts. what potential does something like that have!?
but seriously Brit - you're a police officer you should really be a bit more of a responsible person rather than posting this kind of stuff.0 -
ad44downey wrote: »How much more evidence does the government need before it outlaws the dishonest sleazy buy to let business?
Absolutely, they should concentrate on being one of the largest arms suppliers in the world, which of course is an honest upstanding business and not sleazy in any way whatsoever...sheesh....
When are you people going to get a grip and understand BTL is a business no different to any other business.....the competence of the people that choose to start these businesses varies wildly....0 -
£250k for a property in norfolk park oh my god!! I stayed there my first year at uni. that place is awful, in a fairly bad area of sheffield with a young offenders institute (or used to be) next to it.
they should be worth like £50 or £60k!!0 -
ad44downey wrote: »How much more evidence does the government need before it outlaws the dishonest sleazy buy to let business?
But how would...
Oh, I can't be bothered to argue. I give in. I agree. Ban all BTL. Ban them all. Councils should buy a sleazometer and hook all potential business owners up to it and anyone that failed should be banned from owning a business. Government officials should be employed to outlaw all businesses run by people who aren't particulary nice.
Here's an idea. All potential business owners should go through a test whereby they are placed in an empty room apart from a box of kittens and a hammer. They will be observed by a bunch of government officials with clipboards behind one-way glass to see if they beat the kittens to death with the hammer until they are pulp, or just cuddle them. They'd have to pass this test to be given their business license.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards