We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Group Section 32 Buy Out

I have been informed that an old company pension with Scottish Equitable (High Equity With Profit Fund) is being transferred by the trustees into my own name. The Financial Management company that is dealing with this transfer has chosen as the default fund the Aegon SE Managed Mixed Fund. I am considering retiring in four and a half years time, should I be thinking about a "safe" fund now or later?

Comments

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,368 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    IMHO .....

    Assuming
    - you intend to purchase an annuity when you retire in 4.5 years
    - this pension is necessary to fund your retirement
    - its current value is reasonably close to being sufficient to fund your retirement
    - you dont fancy a gamble

    I would certainly put a significant part of the pot (more than 50%, possibly up to 100%) into something very safe now. You can then steadily transfer further funds from the riskier fund into the safe one during the next 3-4 years so that you are fully safe before you take any irrevocable actions.

    If the assumptions dont hold - for example you have sufficient funds elsewhere to retire, you could keep your SE pension exposed to equities with the intention of taking it later if necessary.
  • cogito
    cogito Posts: 4,898 Forumite
    Linton wrote: »
    IMHO .....

    Assuming
    - you intend to purchase an annuity when you retire in 4.5 years
    - this pension is necessary to fund your retirement
    - its current value is reasonably close to being sufficient to fund your retirement
    - you dont fancy a gamble

    I would certainly put a significant part of the pot (more than 50%, possibly up to 100%) into something very safe now. You can then steadily transfer further funds from the riskier fund into the safe one during the next 3-4 years so that you are fully safe before you take any irrevocable actions.

    If the assumptions dont hold - for example you have sufficient funds elsewhere to retire, you could keep your SE pension exposed to equities with the intention of taking it later if necessary.

    But what in the current climate can be regarded as very safe? A fund such as Standard Life Sterling Fund?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,368 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    cogito wrote: »
    But what in the current climate can be regarded as very safe? A fund such as Standard Life Sterling Fund?

    Have a look on http://www.trustnet.com/Pension.aspx for fixed interest and cash funds.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    GiJo wrote: »
    I have been informed that an old company pension with Scottish Equitable (High Equity With Profit Fund) is being transferred by the trustees into my own name. The Financial Management company that is dealing with this transfer has chosen as the default fund the Aegon SE Managed Mixed Fund. I am considering retiring in four and a half years time, should I be thinking about a "safe" fund now or later?


    Typically, the reason why S32 buyout pensions are invested in the insurance company's With profits fund, is that they have guarantees attached to them which the insurer must meet, regardless of the investment performance of the fund.

    Does this move have any implications for any guarantees that may be attached to your S32 policy?Typical guarantees would be a guaranteed minimum pension (GMP, relates to being contracted out of SERPs) , spouse pension, indexation after retirement, etc.

    An S32 contains a number of elements which are derived from your original final salary pension, in which risk is borne by the employer (and later the insurance company).What is being suggested however looks more like a money purchase pension in which risk is borne by the employee.

    Suggest you clarify exactly what is being proposed by the change.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • GiJo
    GiJo Posts: 268 Forumite
    Thanks for the replies. Will have to do some research.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.