We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Bail Out Sucks
Generali
Posts: 36,411 Forumite
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7874434.stm
US Government in 'Rubbish' Shocker:
What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?
US Government in 'Rubbish' Shocker:
The Congressional Oversight Panel says the government overpaid for distressed financial assets and shares last year.
It says the US Treasury paid $78bn (£53bn) more than it should when buying stakes in banks through the $700bn Troubled Assets Relief Program (Tarp).
What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?
0
Comments
-
US Treasury paid $78bn (£53bn) more than it should
Was that Paulsen's commission ?? :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7874434.stm
US Government in 'Rubbish' Shocker:
What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?
I read that our banks had $98bn off assets they could use to claim out of the American package.
Hope it was our banks:)0 -
What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?
To be any less than 10% wrong would be a 'result' for our Government !!!!!'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Difference between us and the US - our govt WILL NEVER ADMIT how badly they got it wrong.
To be fair, it's politically acceptable in the US only because they've had a change of govt.
The same here might uncover quite a few skeletons too.0 -
They needed the extra money on top for the bonuses and perks of course....
Learjet loan to former CEO by Citi, to go on family holiday to Mexico:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/feb/02/citigroup-chief-excutive-salaries-jet
$1.2million for new office for Bank of America CEO:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28793175/
Tens of billions of bonuses for Merill, Citi and Goldman:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/03/wall-street-bonuses200903
Oink!
--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
you or the courts cant find out because he made sure the emergency legislation was worded nicely so that there can be no congressional or court oversight of any decision he makes with CRAP sorry meant TARP.Was that Paulsen's commission ?? :eek:
ps: goldman sachs is a big beneficiary of TARP. he is an ex goldman sachs employee, another chap who is running the TARP is also an ex goldman sachs employee. wonder why they rushed through TARP (without court oversight) was it to hide any fraudulent activity, was there any quid pro quo. will we ever know. only time will tell.bubblesmoney :hello:0 -
bubblesmoney wrote: »you or the courts cant find out because he made sure the emergency legislation was worded nicely so that there can be no congressional or court oversight of any decision he makes with CRAP sorry meant TARP.
ps: goldman sachs is a big beneficiary of TARP. he is an ex goldman sachs employee, another chap who is running the TARP is also an ex goldman sachs employee. wonder why they rushed through TARP (without court oversight) was it to hide any fraudulent activity, was there any quid pro quo. will we ever know. only time will tell.
looks like in the final draft because of failure in the 1st pass in the senate, the judicial oversight immunity was removed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008Potential conflict of interest
There is concern that the current plan creates a conflict of interest for Paulson. Paulson is a former CEO of Goldman Sachs and Goldman stands to benefit from the bailout. Paulson has hired Goldman executives as advisors and Paulson’s former advisors have joined banks that will also benefit from the bailout. Furthermore, the original proposal exempted Paulson from judicial oversight. Thus there is concern that former illegal activity by a financial institution or its executives might be hidden.[64][65][66]
The treasury staff member responsible for administering the bailout funds is Neel Kashkari, a former vice-president at Goldman Sachs.Judicial review
The bill establishes that actions taken by the Treasury Secretary regarding this program are subject to judicial review,[175][185] reversing the request for immunity made in the original Paulson proposal.[186]
Oversight
See also: Oversight of the Troubled Assets Relief Programbubblesmoney :hello:0 -
Geez..........it was only a joke Bubbla !!!!
No need to spend 30 minutes Googling yourself into a frenzy !!!'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
i didnt need to google it now as had already read this a while ago and had reffered to these things in a few of my earlier posts as well long ago.Geez..........it was only a joke Bubbla !!!!
No need to spend 30 minutes Googling yourself into a frenzy !!!
btw do you still not like wiki
. i find it useful (and best part its free). bubblesmoney :hello:0 -
i find it useful
So do I, I only work myself into a frenzy :mad: when it's quoted as Fact'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards