We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Bail Out Sucks

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7874434.stm

US Government in 'Rubbish' Shocker:
The Congressional Oversight Panel says the government overpaid for distressed financial assets and shares last year.
It says the US Treasury paid $78bn (£53bn) more than it should when buying stakes in banks through the $700bn Troubled Assets Relief Program (Tarp).

What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?
«1

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    US Treasury paid $78bn (£53bn) more than it should

    Was that Paulsen's commission ?? :eek:
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Generali wrote: »
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7874434.stm

    US Government in 'Rubbish' Shocker:



    What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?

    I read that our banks had $98bn off assets they could use to claim out of the American package.
    Hope it was our banks:)
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    What do you think will be the result of the UK Govt investment in UK banks?

    To be any less than 10% wrong would be a 'result' for our Government !!!!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Difference between us and the US - our govt WILL NEVER ADMIT how badly they got it wrong.

    To be fair, it's politically acceptable in the US only because they've had a change of govt.

    The same here might uncover quite a few skeletons too.
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    They needed the extra money on top for the bonuses and perks of course....

    Learjet loan to former CEO by Citi, to go on family holiday to Mexico:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/feb/02/citigroup-chief-excutive-salaries-jet

    $1.2million for new office for Bank of America CEO:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28793175/

    Tens of billions of bonuses for Merill, Citi and Goldman:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/03/wall-street-bonuses200903


    Oink!


    79763-Laughing-pigs-0.jpg
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • bubblesmoney
    bubblesmoney Posts: 2,156 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    purch wrote: »
    Was that Paulsen's commission ?? :eek:
    you or the courts cant find out because he made sure the emergency legislation was worded nicely so that there can be no congressional or court oversight of any decision he makes with CRAP sorry meant TARP.

    ps: goldman sachs is a big beneficiary of TARP. he is an ex goldman sachs employee, another chap who is running the TARP is also an ex goldman sachs employee. wonder why they rushed through TARP (without court oversight) was it to hide any fraudulent activity, was there any quid pro quo. will we ever know. only time will tell.
    bubblesmoney :hello:
  • bubblesmoney
    bubblesmoney Posts: 2,156 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    you or the courts cant find out because he made sure the emergency legislation was worded nicely so that there can be no congressional or court oversight of any decision he makes with CRAP sorry meant TARP.

    ps: goldman sachs is a big beneficiary of TARP. he is an ex goldman sachs employee, another chap who is running the TARP is also an ex goldman sachs employee. wonder why they rushed through TARP (without court oversight) was it to hide any fraudulent activity, was there any quid pro quo. will we ever know. only time will tell.

    looks like in the final draft because of failure in the 1st pass in the senate, the judicial oversight immunity was removed.
    Potential conflict of interest
    There is concern that the current plan creates a conflict of interest for Paulson. Paulson is a former CEO of Goldman Sachs and Goldman stands to benefit from the bailout. Paulson has hired Goldman executives as advisors and Paulson’s former advisors have joined banks that will also benefit from the bailout. Furthermore, the original proposal exempted Paulson from judicial oversight. Thus there is concern that former illegal activity by a financial institution or its executives might be hidden.[64][65][66]
    The treasury staff member responsible for administering the bailout funds is Neel Kashkari, a former vice-president at Goldman Sachs.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008
    Judicial review
    The bill establishes that actions taken by the Treasury Secretary regarding this program are subject to judicial review,[175][185] reversing the request for immunity made in the original Paulson proposal.[186]

    Oversight

    See also: Oversight of the Troubled Assets Relief Program
    bubblesmoney :hello:
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Geez..........it was only a joke Bubbla !!!!

    No need to spend 30 minutes Googling yourself into a frenzy !!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • bubblesmoney
    bubblesmoney Posts: 2,156 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    purch wrote: »
    Geez..........it was only a joke Bubbla !!!!

    No need to spend 30 minutes Googling yourself into a frenzy !!!
    i didnt need to google it now as had already read this a while ago and had reffered to these things in a few of my earlier posts as well long ago.

    btw do you still not like wiki :p . i find it useful (and best part its free).
    bubblesmoney :hello:
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    i find it useful

    So do I, I only work myself into a frenzy :mad: when it's quoted as Fact
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.