We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

B of E Base Rate: 5th February 2009

124»

Comments

  • space_rider
    space_rider Posts: 1,741 Forumite
    Cut
    So, have you kept the payments the same OR do you save the difference at 5%?

    I think they'll hold.

    GG

    I actually budgeted to pay 7.09% when my deal ran out in December so I am paying Abbey 6.04 and saving the difference between 7.09 and 6.04 each month in an account that will pay 5%. They actually reduced my payments this month to 4.04 even though I asked them to leave it the same. Can`t be bothered to ring them again so just adjusted the standing order accordingly. Probably a better option as company I work for is a bit iffy at the moment profit wise and we are on quarterly review. If we aren`t making enough money they`ll pull the plug.
  • Pobby
    Pobby Posts: 5,438 Forumite
    Cut
    All I can say is, with all my years on this planet I cannot understand how such a huge, total mess has been allowed to happen. Chit, have tried to save for retirement and now that`s getting screwed over. Bollox to the lot of them!
  • Cut
    i`ll go for a cut of 0.75% and bet its not the final cut
  • brummybloke
    brummybloke Posts: 1,518
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    i doubt there will be any rise in interest rates until after the next election, then however i think it may have to go up a large amount quite quickly as the next government will have nothing to lose by raising them immediately after the elections, they can reduce them for the final year before the next election again.
    what is the plural of moose?


    slags
  • Cut
    i doubt there will be any rise in interest rates until after the next election, then however i think it may have to go up a large amount quite quickly as the next government will have nothing to lose by raising them immediately after the elections, they can reduce them for the final year before the next election again.

    Thats only if the next govt takes back control of interest rates
  • brummybloke
    brummybloke Posts: 1,518
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    woodbine wrote: »
    Thats only if the next govt takes back control of interest rates
    did they ever really give it up?
    what is the plural of moose?


    slags
  • Cut
    woodbine wrote: »
    i`ll go for a cut of 0.75% and bet its not the final cut

    I was going to say the same. I can feel it in my blood.
    I am a Mortgage Consultant and don't like to be told what I can and can't put in a signature so long as it's legal and truthful.
  • Cut
    GooeyBlob wrote: »
    it's now at the stage where they are counter-productive, as they do little or nothing for mortgage holders


    I beg to differ, my tracker mortgage means I am now paying less on the interest in my mortgage by more than £300 per month.
    I have maintained my payments which means all this saving is going to pay off the capital

    A reduction to 1% will mean I am paying more than £350 per month more of the capital repayment :T
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • harry_w
    harry_w Posts: 54 Forumite
    Keep the rate at 1.5%
    Better to protect the currency from further decline now rather than turn a devaluation into a currency collapse. No-one will fund billions in bailouts to banks and 'stimulus' for select groups of voters and politicians' pet projects, if they're only going to be repaid in paper that's worth less than when they lent it.

    However, it looks like that's what they'll do - continue the war on savers and future taxpayers. This time they'll ease it through by promising to buy off pensioners with exemption from tax, a cheap sop now which will cost much more in future years. Politically, it will probably work.

    People today trying to save for a deposit on a house (or anything) will continue to be taxed on near zero interest rates in a currency being deliberately devalued, to prop up those who created the bubble - the mega-mortgage debtors and the banks who lent them the money, then sold on the debts.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.