Legal ? re: CCJ

simj37

Tootsie_Roll wrote:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!

:T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T

My my Tootsie, not like you to give in so soon

Tootsie_Roll

simj37 wrote:

:T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T

My my Tootsie, not like you to give in so soon

Please see edit.

simj37

[/QUOTE]

Tootsie_Roll wrote:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!!

edit as just re-read your post.

" However if it is not and has not been for the past six years then by virtue of section 24 (1) no further action can be taken".

We have already agreed this is incorrect. I really can't be bothered to reply anymore as you just don't seem to be getting it. As previously mentioned please see other reference sites for clarification and stop blindy quoting from Section 24 (1).

You may think that this is incorrect, however I never did.

FYI

http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/cp151apa.pdf