We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Printing money
Comments
-
0
-
Did you know the US Government actually printed 100,000 dollar bills back in the thirties? they were issued for interbank use only and were not meant for the general population. A very small amount has reached some collectors.
http://myinvestingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/100000.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_denominations_of_United_States_currency0 -
travellingbum wrote: »Did you know the US Government actually printed 100,000 dollar bills back in the thirties? they were issued for interbank use only and were not meant for the general population. A very small amount has reached some collectors.
http://myinvestingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/100000.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_denominations_of_United_States_currency
Many years ago, I cancelled bearer bonds as a very small part of my job. It was a very odd feeling taking what was in effect $50,000,000 in $1,000,000 notes and making it worthless using a sort of giant hole punch to punch the date into the notes.
Printing money is a very bad idea BTW.0 -
travellingbum wrote: »Did you know the US Government actually printed 100,000 dollar bills back in the thirties? they were issued for interbank use only and were not meant for the general population. A very small amount has reached some collectors.
http://myinvestingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/100000.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_denominations_of_United_States_currency
£1 million and £100 million (!) notes do actually exist in the UK. They're held by the Scottish banks (if there are any left) as they have to hold Bank of England notes of the same value of any Scottish notes they print, so that any notes printed by Scottish banks do not increase the money supply and the BoE retains control of the value of notes printed.
So there are symbolic (but legal) £100M BoE notes held by the Scottish banks.
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/about/other_notes.htm
Maybe if quantitative easing starts to flow, we can all get our hands on some £100M notes :eek:0 -
I'm interested to know, what is the negative points of quantative easing?
In simple terms it would seem that those with cash suffer while those in debt (mortgages included) would benefit as the debt is worth less
But what other consequences is there?:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I'm interested to know, what is the negative points of quantative easing?
In simple terms it would seem that those with cash suffer while those in debt (mortgages included) would benefit as the debt is worth less
But what other consequences is there?
The biggest (and very real) risk is that the bond market will view this as inflationary and demand a higher rate of interest to compensate them for their being repaid using devalued currency. This will be a significant drain on the taxpayer as they will have to pay out more in interest charges. About GBP130,000,000,000 in Gilts will be issued this year according to the Treasury. I suspect that will be more like GBP140-150,000,000,000. An extra 1% in interest costs would mean an extra GBP1,500,000,000 per year in taxes until that debt is repaid.
That means an extra GBP60/year on the average household's taxes.
The trouble is, that isn't the end of it as all the UK's debt will need to pay a higher rate of interest as it comes up to be rolled over. It was a significant problem in the 1980s. Interest rates would need to be raised at inappropriate times to maintain the pound and bond issuance as markets feared a return to the inflation of the 1970s. Correctly as it turned out.0 -
Wicked_witch wrote: »Actually physically printing money? As in our paper cash outweighing the actual gold reserve? How would that help???
I can't admit to knowing much about this, but isn't it true that we've long since abandoned the gold standard anyway? Something to do with Churchill or Chamberlain if I remember correctly.0 -
omelette451 wrote: »I can't admit to knowing much about this, but isn't it true that we've long since abandoned the gold standard anyway? Something to do with Churchill or Chamberlain if I remember correctly.
The Gold Standard was re-introduced by Churchill in 1925 and it was abandoned in 1931.0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I'm interested to know, what is the negative points of quantative easing?
In simple terms it would seem that those with cash suffer while those in debt (mortgages included) would benefit as the debt is worth less
But what other consequences is there?
House prices crash even harder.0 -
>House prices crash even harder.<
Depends. Once inflation takes hold, there could be increased demand of tangible assets as the purchasing power of savings falls.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards