RBS about to implode?

ad9898_3

Kenny4315 wrote: »

:mad: :mad: WHAT A GNIKCUF SHAMBLES ? :mad: :mad: :mad:

They should haul the board and senior managers to court :mad: , and have them pay back all the monies that they have been paid to run this sorry PILE OF SH*TE :mad: , if that does not clear the debts (which it won't they should sieze their assets and sell them :mad: , this will send a message that we won't accept these F*CK ups any longer :mad: ), because clearly they have been just PiZZing around for many years :mad: , and now the burden is coming to haunt the general public :mad: , it's an ABSOLUTE GNIKCUF disgrace :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: , and I'm getting more annoyed everyday with these useless high paid W*ankers :mad: :mad: who couldn't get laid in a brothel let alone run multi-billion pound companies. :mad: :mad:

Mr Clowns & Hs Darlings solution of bailing these T*ATS out isn't working because it's a total mess. :mad:

Where have the auditors been, asleep, or kissing up for more contracts ? :mad: Why where there no government controls ? :mad:
Why was this situation not brought to light 3 years ago ?

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

LET THEM GO UNDER, YOU MAY AS WELL JUST OPEN A NEW BANK UNDER GOVERNMENT CONTROL FROM THE START, AS THEY ARE NOT PASSING ON THE CREDIT ANYWAY, THIS IS A DISASTER MOVIE GONE WRONG. :mad: :mad: :mad:

Jesus Kenny, that's a fair rant, which I completely agree with, you don't have shares do you ?

wymondham

funkyfreddy9k wrote: »

but it you dont pumpt money into the supposedly unviable banks, then how are perfectly viable profital normal companies supposed to continue with no credit facility for which they rely on for cash flow?

it's all broken isnt it - having to support unviable banks purely to keep afloat solvent businesses afloat ... crazy :rolleyes:

Kenny4315

ad9898 wrote: »

Jesus Kenny, that's a fair rant, which I completely agree with, you don't have shares do you ?

Unfortunately, I have shares in UK PLC :mad: , or UK BANK FAT CAT BAILOUT PLC. :mad:

Looks like they'll be having a INVOLUNTARY rights issue in the near future namely a huge tax rise of my hard earned, while these BAR STEWARDS are still living it up. :mad:

JonnyBravo

StevieJ wrote: »

Why don't RBS lend themselves some funds

Because they don't do sub-prime lending....... any more.
:rolleyes:

mikeopvc

same here
what does this mean for us who have a mortgage with RBSh!t

ad9898_3

Kenny4315 wrote: »

Unfortunately, I have shares in UK PLC :mad: , or UK BANK FAT CAT BAILOUT PLC. :mad:

Looks like they'll be having a INVOLUNTARY rights issue in the near future namely a huge tax rise of my hard earned, while these BAR STEWARDS are still living it up. :mad:

You're probably right. You know, if this type of thing carries on, I'm off. I was talking to my ex's uncle today down here in Oz, where I'm staying for a while. He's working on the Bulldozer's in a quarry, he showed me his wage slip, he's on $49.54 per hour, his top line is $3500 per fortnight, 5 days on, 5 days off.

He said, if you come here for good, I have a few contacts. I know where I'm heading if Brown keeps screwing up, the land of the sun and the V8.:D

WTF?_2

JonnyBravo wrote: »

Because they don't do sub-prime lending....... any more.
:rolleyes:

That's now the domain of the Bank of England - 'The Sub Prime Central Bank'.