We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

over 50s mortgage to help kids

We would like to help out our 3 kids with lump sums at some stage, but none are near a position of being able to get on the housing market and meanwhile our savings stagnate.

Idea is to buy a 2-bed flat now, son and pal live in it and pay rent to cover mortgage, with some left over. We pay off mortgage with lump sums up to 2016 and have income from the rent until market picks up. Then sell flat (or our house and move into the flat) and divvy up the proceeds with the 3 kids.

We have £100k to put into it and would look to borrow £55-75k.

Problem is that husband retires in 2012 and he is chief earner with £40k. I am self-employed 15-25k, due to retire 2016.

We know that we can pay off the mortgage within 7 years at the most, however we would obviously prefer a 25-year mortgage. Problem is - banks aren't going to get much out of it if we can pay off quickly, but if we don't tell them that we can, will they lend to someone so near to retirement? Also is mentioning the rental income a good idea? As far as I can see a "buy-to-let" mortgage, which in effect is what it will be, is interest-only, whereas we would want a repayment with no penalty for repaying with lump sums.

Any advice very welcome for someone who has been out of the mortgage market for a long time!

Comments

  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Buy to let mortgages able to take lump sum redemptions will be no problem, but of course the rate could be higher.
    Age is fine for some lenders, especially for B2L. Having a family member reside will detter some lenders (less likely to demand rent from a loved one in theory).
  • Thanks Conrad, helpful indeed. Perhaps we don't need to mention son then!

    When I put B2L into the mortgage comparison sites they say "nothing available", but there's nowhere in the form to put in a deposit, so it looks as though I am trying to recoup the total value of the house on a rent that is too small, so perhaps that's why.

    Good to know that B2L would be possible - any idea how much higher the rates could be?
  • herbiesjp
    herbiesjp Posts: 8,499 Forumite
    WIth those kind of figures you should be fine

    As Conrad rightly says - if lending to family lenders become limited, but still get very good deals
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Thanks for your help - very speedy too, great forum.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.