We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Chelsea mortgage rate?
Comments
-
They can't be looking that hard as most of their competition have reduced their rates over the past three months. In some cases the competition now have an SVR of less than half of Chelsea's. It will be interesting to see whether they come up with more excusses not to reduce their excessive SVR following the latest BoE cut while at the same time they've always managed to reduce their savings rates following BoE cuts !0
-
Jasper, that's interesting to know.
I'll get my "moan" about chelsea out in Youtube quickly.CapitalOne gave £192 in a goodwill gesture.0 -
I take back what I said about Chelsea not looking at what the competition do. They do seem to be reducing their saving rates along with their rivals. Shame the blinkers are on when it comes to the SVR !
Jan 29 2009
http://www.myfinances.co.uk/companies/savings-investments/chelsea-building-society/chelsea-cuts-interest-rates-across-savings-accounts-$1264644.htm
Recent changes to savings rates taken from Chelsea's site
90 Day Notice account (2nd Issue) - REDUCED
Branch Instant - REDUCED
Call Direct Advantage - REDUCED
Chelsea Cash ISA (2nd Issue) - REDUCED
Chelsea Monthly Extra(6) - REDUCED
Chelsea Regular Savings - REDUCED
Classic Account - REDUCED
Exclusive Savings(7) - REDUCED
Portfolio Extra Account (3rd Issue)(1)(2) - REDUCED
At this point I gave up looking any further as they all seem to have been reduced.
However...
SVR - UNCHANGED (to date) regardless of 4 aggressive, and succesive, cuts to the BoE rate.
Says it all really - the only people benefitting from Chelsea rate changes are Chelsea Building Society themselves.0 -
0
-
It gets changed to 'under review' after each BoE reduction so I'm not holding my breath. It also fobs you off with the reason they take so much longer that everyone else to come to a decision. Roughly translated it means 'we're hoping you'll forget'0
-
Just sent them an email via the contact page, more to vent my frustration than anything.
They sent back a letter saying they have no plans at present to cut rates. Sounds fairly final to me. As much as i would love them to, i don't think they will cut their SVR soon. The accusations that they are ripping any of us on the SVR off, seem to be water off a ducks back. They may be in serious financial trouble and just trying to recoup the $50 million Iceland loss ASAP0 -
How do you find this information from the Chelsea BS home page?
It seems its a case of "Well, it's on the website" (but you may have to search hard to find it!:rotfl: ).
I still reckon it's time for the Chelsea borrowers to stand up and make a fuss.
Fancy a day out in Cheltenham on Thursday 23rd April 2009?
SmileyGTarget acheived: _party_ Mortgage offset in June 2012!_party_Mortgage = -£98Endowment = £0Investments = £40,247[STRIKE]Deficit[/STRIKE] / Surplus = £40,149(at 22/09/2017)"Don't spend then save, save then spend!"0 -
So much for Chelsea adopting the 'Treating Customers Fairly' ethos
Much better rates are available to 'Brand new customers' in the hope they look more at the headline rate rather than the rip off SVR they get after their deal period expires.
No doubt when rates start to turn in the other direction they'll not need so much time to make a decision. As soon as I'm able to to move away from these crooks the better, but I guess that's what they're hoping for too.0 -
They would only not be treating customers fairly if they won't allow existing borrowers - at the same LTV that they are willing to lend to new borrowers at - switch to the cheaper new products.
Is that actually the case?
When you say "as soon as I'm able to move away" what precisely is stopping you moving away now?
If it's that you are on a discounted product then you aren't comparing like with like. It it's that your LTV is too high to get a best-rate deal elsewhere (or from Chelsea) then you aren't comparing like with like.0 -
Accept your point re comparing like for like. As it stands my LTV has gone over what most other borrowers would now want to take on based on falling house prices and lenders tightening up the lending criterea. Therefore I'm stuck with them for the time being.
However, my main point is if I was with another lender say C&G for example, my rate would have dropped regardless of the LTV based on the fact they've passed on recent cuts that Chelsea haven't.
As for your comment re TCF and comparing Chelsea's deals for new borrowers and existing borrowers then two examples are below, both up to 65% LTV.
New borrowers
2 Year fixed 3.39%
5 Year Fixed 4.29%
Existing borrowers
2 Year fixed 3.99%
5 Year Fixed 4.69%
SVR regardless of LTV 5.79%0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards