We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Extra into company scheme or AVC ?

Options
Is it better to contribute as much as possible into the company (career average) scheme or put some into an AVC (with Standard Life but also through the company). Bearing in mind I expect to be redundant long before 65, is putting some in the AVC the better option ?
Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,680 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Depends on what you are trying to achieve.

    AVCs are largely obsolete now. Unless there is some employer incentive to use an AVC (matched contributions for example) or the AVC can enhance the lump sum benefit on the main scheme then there is really little reason to tie yourself to an AVC.

    Added years is often the best option but with career average earnings being used, that may not be ideal if the average is likely to be weighted towards the lower end of your earnings. It also depends on whether the average is index linked or not.

    If that option isnt really ideal then stakeholder, personal pension or SIPP come into play.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • That's very interesting, I've been paying AVCs into my company scheme alongside my final salary scheme (but on a money purchase basis) for years now. I always thought that the charges on such a scheme would be less than if I had a separate personal pension for the AVCs - but it sounds like that is not the case.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,680 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I always thought that the charges on such a scheme would be less than if I had a separate personal pension for the AVCs - but it sounds like that is not the case.

    Times change. That used to be the case but from around 2001 it stopped being the case. Stakeholder pensions, whilst a failure at increasing retirement provision, did succeed in bringing charges down on personal pensions. The other change is access to investments. The days of offering one or two (or small handful) of funds on a contract have also gone. Only the poor examples still do this or many in-house AVC schemes.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.