We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Guarduan/Reuters: BoE to cut to 1.5% in Dec

15681011

Comments

  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    BOE figures forcast infaltion next year is likely to be 1% or less. so your surgestion is sagnation coupled with nasty inflation:confused:

    You are not a realist as you have only a care for one side of the argument the side you belive in.
    ;) Your ideaology of the situation points to you not being a realist, sorry.

    So what's your realistic expectation then?
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    setmefree2 wrote: »
    The BOE forecast for inflation in Qtr 2 2009 is 1% (November review) which would suggest the forces of contraction are not as powerful as you suggest. Again time will tell.

    Get a grip. They were very fearful of inflation for the first half of this year, where one in five of my posts since the beginning of the year has probably been about the deflationary crisis approaching.
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    dopester wrote: »
    Can it end at the banks? No. The Government would have to come in to businesses around the country, and tell us how to do our jobs. You're cutting back on x-product? No no no. Order more of it now. It has become more expensive to source from Japan? Nevermind.. still order it, we will lend you more to pay for it, and also our banks will lend your customers money to pay for it at higher prices.

    Then they can come in to the courts and enforce their new objectives there as well... get rid of the judiciary and install their own yes men to get their policies done.

    The banks have to follow what the correct path to match the reality of the world, whilst learning some painful lessons for mistakes of the last 11 years.

    Such has been the extent of bank nationalisations and part nationalisations that the government now have a direct say over more than 50% of UK residential mortgages, at least according to Jon Snow on C4 News a month or two back.
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Your ideaology of the situation points to you not being a realist, sorry.;)

    I'm stuck with what point you are trying to make Really. Sorry.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    !!!!!!? wrote: »
    So what's your realistic expectation then?

    House prices to keep falling next year.

    Resession in banking, retail, and many service based setors for next year possibly coming to 0% growth last quarter next year.(bit of optimisum)

    Interst rates to keep going down, low of 2.0% (possibly Less)

    Infaltion to be below 2% by April 09.

    Unenployment to keep rising throught next year.

    Economic improvement starting 2010, housing stabalization starting 2010.

    No exact forcast or fact as I am being realistic.;)
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dopester wrote: »
    I'm stuck with what point you are trying to make Really. Sorry.

    Well if you are bearish or even pesimisstic in your ideology in what is going to happen you automatic stop becoming a realist as you only focus on what you belive to be true discounting positive data as incorect or even conspiricy.

    EG !!!!!! posting only negative news to support his ideology stops him being a realist.

    hope that makes sense.
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    House prices to keep falling next year.

    Resession in banking, retail, and many service based setors for next year possibly coming to 0% growth last quarter next year.(bit of optimisum)

    Interst rates to keep going down, low of 2.0% (possibly Less)

    Infaltion to be below 2% by April 09.

    Unenployment to keep rising throught next year.

    Economic improvement starting 2010, housing stabalization starting 2010.

    ;) No exact forcast or fact as I am being realistic.

    If we are in a deflationary environment overall, then any CPI represents stagflation.

    In fact, if incomes drop faster than prices then it's exactly the same effect as stagflation - prices running away from people's ability to pay them.

    So basically my 'best case' scenario isn't a million miles away from your 'realistic' scenario.
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    !!!!!!? wrote: »
    If we are in a deflationary environment overall, then any CPI represents stagflation.

    In fact, if incomes drop faster than prices then it's exactly the same effect as stagflation - prices running away from people's ability to pay them.

    So basically my 'best case' scenario isn't a million miles away from your 'realistic' scenario.

    If you did not base your wording on negativeness eg Best Case, Nasty etc and included some positive input I would than class you from the outside as a realist.
    But unfortunatly your neagtive wording does give away a pessimistic views at the moment.

    Am I now forgiven as I am no longer ignored.;)
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    If you did not base your wording on negativeness eg Best Case, Nasty etc and included some positive input I would than class you from the outside as a realist.
    But unfortunatly your neagtive wording does give away a pessimistic views at the moment.

    Am I now forgiven as I am no longer ignored.;)

    You came clean on the Really2 thing - if you were interested in just trolling you'd have started a completely new account.
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    !!!!!!? wrote: »
    You came clean on the Really2 thing - if you were interested in just trolling you'd have started a completely new account.

    If I was trolling I would just call people a XXXX or somting I like to hear what people think. i know what you think and would not rail road over you saying your a XXXX for thinking what you do as I know it is what you belive will happen.

    I have always used psychology and sociology to help make decisions.
    I always have an idea what I am going to do but will then tweek what I am going to do with what I see the masses think.

    (Trying not to sound like a pompus @ss)
    But looking at how you see thing I would call the bottom when people I consider bearish but not as bearish as you start to buy as that will mean the majority had turned. (but not trying to give advice but that is how I would see your best chance of catching the bottom)
    PS the terminally dumb Eg the people who think house price only go up are the same people who will think houses only go down. They will not turn until most probably 2-3 months of HPI as they will need visual confirmation of the bottom. But they then then risk the trap of not wanting to pay £XX,XXXX thus chasing housing up all the way back to rampent hpi:rolleyes: ;) .

    My decision to purchase was just based on my current circumstances and where I saw the market going then getting peoples opinions like on here and HPC.
    I then purchased at a price I was happy with as I a very impatient realist.;) :D

    It would be interesting to know on how you have based your view of buying back, not to prove if I am right or wrong on how you think but just to see what indicator you will use.

    PS Sorry but i cant resist tounge in cheek jokes so sorry if you think I am taking the pee somtimes but I am just having a bit of banter usualy.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.