We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The MSE House Price Forum Bull Trap?

123457

Comments

  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    boyse7en wrote: »
    Sorry, maybe I'm mis-reading it.

    What is the difference between not wanting to buy into HPI, and wanting to buy a house whose value "is likely to increase in the future" then?

    If you want to buy at the bottom of the market (very sensible) and then see the value of your house/home increase, then surely you'll want that increase to be as fast and big as possible, which I thought was the definition of HPI. :confused:

    You will have his head spinning.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    boyse7en wrote: »
    Sorry, maybe I'm mis-reading it.

    What is the difference between not wanting to buy into HPI, and wanting to buy a house whose value "is likely to increase in the future" then?

    If you want to buy at the bottom of the market (very sensible) and then see the value of your house/home increase, then surely you'll want that increase to be as fast and big as possible, which I thought was the definition of HPI. :confused:

    Houses generally go up in line with general inflation as a given.

    HPI was all about houses rocketing to the moon out of all proportion to a sense of fair value.

    The HPC which we are now experiencing is the natural reaction to that period of madness.


    I'll be looking to buy after things have bottomed out and prices show some sign of keeping pace with inflation so I don't face a loss if personal circumstances change.

    HPI is illusory. I'll probably want to climb the ladder at some stage (unless house prices were to drop astoundingly low before they bottomed out) so HPI wouldn't benefit me at all, making steps on the ladder further apart. An important fact that many of the people who thought that stupidly expensive houses were great seem to have missed out on.
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    !!!!!!? wrote: »
    I hope that this fanatical following aren't too devastated by the fact that I might consider making a BTL investment at some point if it's financially sensible.

    Im not so sure !!!!!!?. BTL Landlords are generally hated on this board.
  • ad44downey
    ad44downey Posts: 2,246 Forumite
    Dan: wrote: »
    . BTL Landlords are generally hated on this board.
    chucky is , that's for sure. :rotfl:I wonder just how many unfortunates he manages to squeeze into his slum dwellings
    Krusty & Phil Madoff, 1990 - 2007:
    "Buy now because house prices only ever go UP, UP, UP."
  • !!!!!!? wrote: »
    No, I've said I'll consider BTL a few years down the line when the likely yield is more sensible.

    I'm not overly keen to face the hassle and responsibilities of renting a house out so the yield will have to be something considerably better than a decent common or garden investment product, something not generally the case in recent years.

    It's not my fault if tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of greedy innumerate fools have bought into it without working it through first and now face financial ruin. It's certainly not my responsibility to bail them out by funding the governments panic measures (through taxes and loss of interest on my savings).

    !!!!!!? You come across as are horrible, greedy, vulture circling over other people's misfortunes. Maybe it isn't your fault that people are going to lose their jobs and their businesses and finally lose their homes but your don't have to salivate continuously like some sort of Scrooge - get a grip.You do have control over that. There's more to life than money mate.:rolleyes:
  • !!!!!!? wrote: »
    I have 'fans'? How terrific! :j


    <throws pants at !!!!!! to keep the board happy>
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • boyse7en wrote: »
    Sorry, maybe I'm mis-reading it.

    What is the difference between not wanting to buy into HPI, and wanting to buy a house whose value "is likely to increase in the future" then?

    Answering for myself, not !!!!!!, when I buy I don't want prices to rocket. Ideally, they'd increase only in line with general inflation.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • fc123
    fc123 Posts: 6,573 Forumite
    !!!!!!? You come across as are horrible, greedy, vulture circling over other people's misfortunes. Maybe it isn't your fault that people are going to lose their jobs and their businesses and finally lose their homes but your don't have to salivate continuously like some sort of Scrooge - get a grip.You do have control over that. There's more to life than money mate.:rolleyes:
    Errr...... hello newbie......errr....no he doesn't.....and you are newbie...so how can you post opinion based on 1 post??

    Could be somethink on the telly now?
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    <throws pants at !!!!!! to keep the board happy>

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • fc123 wrote: »
    Errr...... hello newbie......errr....no he doesn't.....and you are newbie...so how can you post opinion based on 1 post??

    Could be somethink on the telly now?

    How can you defend this poster with comments like this?

    "It's not my fault if tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of greedy innumerate fools have bought into it without working it through first and now face financial ruin. It's certainly not my responsibility to bail them out by funding the governments panic measures (through taxes and loss of interest on my savings)" !!!!!!?




    People have worked really hard to build up businesses,careers, homes and pensions that are now under immense stress and this clown calls them "greedy, innumerate fools."

    I agree with him - at least to some degree - there is at least one innumerate fool out there, the one that is employing this comedian to spend all day in a chatroom spouting his scheunfreuden bile instead of insisting he gets on with some WORK. For someone who is obviously a lazy slacker to be critising everyone else is totally reprehensible. I truly hope he gets what he deserves and I wish that it was "not my responsiblilty to pay for his benefits when he's out of work" to paraphrase the buffoon.

    He's a lazy, greedy, vulture - no better than those he criticises (the property developers, the bankers, the estate agents) he, and all those like him, are just the other side of the same coin.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.