We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
State to save HBOS and RBS
Comments
- 
            They'll have to fire the singing guy in their adverts. About time.Savings
 £14,200 with £1100 M.I.A. presumed dead.0
- 
            So anyone who has bank shares will be given the option to buy extra new ones that pay them 10% interest every year no matter what? Wouldnt that make holding them for 10 years a no brainer0
- 
            sabretoothtigger wrote: »So anyone who has bank shares will be given the option to buy extra new ones that pay them 10% interest every year no matter what? Wouldnt that make holding them for 10 years a no brainer
 No, the govt's shares will do that, not anyone else's....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
- 
            sabretoothtigger wrote: »So anyone who has bank shares will be given the option to buy extra new ones that pay them 10% interest every year no matter what? Wouldnt that make holding them for 10 years a no brainer
 First sentence: Correct. Second sentence: No. Think about whether there will be any dividends.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
- 
            I knew it sounded too good to be true, well I dont know if the public will buy ordinary shares right now even if it makes much better sense then previous rights issues or of course buying at 10 pounds a share, people dont think like that.
 The yield on many bank shares was actually above 10% in theory, Im not sure how that will stand in future
 Basically it sounds like the government gets an amazing deal at the expense of share holders who should be grateful for not losing everything0
- 
            sabretoothtigger wrote: »Basically it sounds like the government gets an amazing deal at the expense of share holders who should be grateful for not losing everything
 As it should be. I didn't see the shareholders standing up and complaining when the dodgy deals were being struck which would eventually bring the business to the point of collapse.--
 Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0
- 
            I always thought the self cert was really off but its hard to foresee the cascade effect the whole thing would have and I had no idea about the Fed operating FNM towards sub prime even though people gave warnings 9 years ago that this idea might collapse badly.
 Even a building society had sub prime debt apparently, these things just arent public info afaik even to shareholders.
 I can foresee now though that having a good relationship with your local bs manager would be an idea for any future home owners. The government saw off NR home owners and they'll do the same with the others now they have the influence to do so0
- 
            They'll have to fire the singing guy in their adverts. About time.
 Has already been done. See link below
 http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1091667&highlight=Howard+BrownIt's always the grass that suffers, irrespective of whether the elephants are fighting or making love !!!0
- 
            Is it really that stupid? If the alternative is to suck all the good companies into the grinder with the bad ones ..... ?
 Lehman's debt assets were auctioned off for less than 10% of face value, leaving $350 billion of payments due from the debt swap insurers - to be paid in 2 weeks. Who knows who has that liability, although obviously a good chunk was at AIG? What about their reinsurers?
 i think that you'll find that the Lehmans debt assets were auctioned to provide a Recovery Value for the CDS trades that are on the market.
 Lehmans debt assets were not auctioned off.
 $350 billion of payments can be in either cash or other bonds - it will not all be cash settlements. these settlements are specific to each trade and will probably be found out over the next few weeks showing who is most exposed.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


 
          
         