Crash Crash Crash !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

chucky

pwllbwdr wrote: »

Muppets eh?

The prices are indeed similar to those a year ago. Which is why the year on year change figure is close to zero. Which is surprisingly close to what I said.

But you said "We're crossing the 0% line going down, equivalent to Mar/Apr 2008."

In what relevant sense, Kermit, is this "equivalent" to Mar/Apr 2008.

ignore the clown - he's the entertainment around here

blisk3

pwllbwdr wrote: »

Muppets eh?

The prices are indeed similar to those a year ago. Which is why the year on year change figure is close to zero. Which is surprisingly close to what I said.

But you said "We're crossing the 0% line going down, equivalent to Mar/Apr 2008."

In what relevant sense, Kermit, is this "equivalent" to Mar/Apr 2008.

I didn't say that, reread my post.

blisk3

chucky wrote: »

ignore the clown - he's the entertainment around here

Chucky, chucky, chucky, more sour grapes. :rotfl: :beer:

You've got nothing useful to say, that's why you post non-posts.

Really2

blisk3 wrote: »

Where did I say that, go back and read my post.

I did,
You said

blisk3 wrote: »

We're crossing the 0% line going down, equivalent to Mar/Apr 2008.

Equivalent means equal in value, if not explain what you mean with the Mar/Apr 2008 comment.

You made an error reading the graph, you are not the first, so don't dig to far. Just admit you made an error as Mar/Apr 2008 is totally irelevent to Dec 2010 YoY HPI.

chucky

blisk3 wrote: »

I didn't say that, reread my post.

i did, you don't understand YoY graphs and notional values.

sour grapes??

no, just much more intelligent than you...

now remind me how you worked out prices going negative YoY is less than the price was 2 years ago...

now go and do your homework you little boy...

blisk3

Really2 wrote: »

I did,
You said


Equivalent means equal in value, if not explain what you mean with the Mar/Apr 2008 comment.

You made an error reading the graph, you are not the first, so don't dig to far. Just admit you made an error as Mar/Apr 2008 is totally irelevent to Dec 2010 YoY HPI.

Yes, the 0% now is equivalent to 0% in Mar/Apr 2008, it's 0%.

The trend is downwards, I haven't mentioned specific house prices.

You, like other muppets read things into posts. :rotfl:

chucky

blisk3 wrote: »

Yes, the 0% now is equivalent to 0% in Mar/Apr 2008, it's 0%.

absolutely brilliant, excellent analysis. but a wrong one...

you really are a blunt instrument but YoY graphs don't work that way... i'd try again if i was you...

you're best left alone and your size 36 Windings font, you're beyond help...

blisk3

chucky wrote: »

i did, you don't understand YoY graphs and notional values.

sour grapes??

no, just much more intelligent than you...

now remind me how you worked out prices going negative YoY is less than the price was 2 years ago...

now go and do your homework you little boy...

Chuck chuck chucky scurries off mumbling with his tail between his legs. :rotfl: :beer:

Really2

blisk3 wrote: »

The trend is downwards, I haven't mentioned specific house prices.

Oh dear you really don't understand, from positive HPI the graph has to go down to make prices the same as the year before.


That does not mean prices are falling, it means prices are stagnating.

if you had 10% HPI and a horizontal line for then next year that would mean you had constant YoY 10% gains. Not the same value.

chucky

blisk3 wrote: »

Chuck chuck chucky scurries off mumbling with his tail between his legs. :rotfl: :beer:

nope, wrong again.

i'm still here but trying to help someone when they don't seem to have a basic education isn't something i'm going to be able to do for you.