We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

settle a credit card arguement

this person i know owes loads of money on various different credit cards and he said he only has to pay each one £1 a month as the law allows him to do that.I argued it but he said loans are different but with credit cards thats what you can do, can anyone settle this arguement?

Comments

  • GeorgeUK
    GeorgeUK Posts: 7,737 Forumite
    If they have an agreement with the creditor they can do that, otherwise they will get interest and charges applied to their account. They may be taken to court for a CCJ or Charging Order against their house or the Debt may be sold to a debt collection agency who will take court action.
    After falling off the gambling wagon (twice): £33,600 (24,000+ 9,600) - Original CC Debt: £7,885.91

    Dad Gift 6k ¦ Savings & Inv Tst: £2,500
    Loan 10k: £0 ¦ Dad 5.5k: £2,270 ¦ LTSB: £0 ¦ RBS: £0 ¦ Virgin £0 ¦ Egg £0

    Total Owed: £2,270 (+6k) 11/08/2011
  • Ames
    Ames Posts: 18,459 Forumite
    You can do that, but only if you can't afford more (ie on benefits or really low income), and only if you don't mind your credit rating being trashed.
    Unless I say otherwise 'you' means the general you not you specifically.
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,514 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This person will have defaults on their credit record, with interest added to the amount owing and charges UNLESS they have an agreement with their credit card company. Even if they can show that this is the maximum they can afford, they may get a CCJ or charging order.

    The most likely reason for the agreement is that they have a debt management plan, usually arranged via a debt charity and the creditor has agreed to temporary low payments in the hope of getting the full sum back long term. The debt management plan covers all their debts and the creditors are paid pro rata.The amount that can be afforded is reviewed every 6 months to a year and there is no guarantee that the creditors will accept the DMP or halt charges and interest, immediately or in the longer term. Some do so for 6 months or a year before starting again.

    One of the conditions of this agreement is that the person takes no further credit. The fact that they have already acknowledged that they are unable to make minimum payments on their existing debt means that they are open to allegations of fraud if they take more credit.

    The other time when people do this is whilst they are setting up a debt managment plan and they send a letter and a token payment to show willing whilst the debt charity contacts the creditors. That may delay or halt immediate court action.

    Creditor attitudes have however hardened considerably since the credit crunch started.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.