We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Lehmans

18911131446

Comments

  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    Here's a view that seems to be gaining momentum:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/26656750/site/14081545/?1

    The end result of the global economic slowdown may be the U.S. announcing national bankruptcy as the government cannot afford the bailouts that it promised and the market will not bail out the government, Martin Hennecke, senior manager of private clients at Tyche, told CNBC on Thursday.


    Interesting that these views are now becoming somewhat mainstream instead of the domain of the 'Tinfoil Hat Brigade"...
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No we've gone over this, they wont be nationalised or receive debt support that bears did. This is why barclays walked and they are right to do so

    The alternative is insolvency if nobody will do business with them in the money markets. I just don't see the US Government letting that happen despite it being the right thing, probably.

    There's some talk about splitting Lehmans into a 'good bank' and a 'bad bank'. Someone's still going to have to take the losses from the bad side no matter how you dice things.

    "It's a big !!!!!! sandwich and we're all going to have to take a bite"
    Is soros still an investor, is there any way to tell

    Bloomberg lists the notifiable positions (those over a certain size - it varies by market). Presumably they get the information from the New York Stock Exchange or wherever it is that Lehmans is listed.
  • ad44downey
    ad44downey Posts: 2,246 Forumite
    amcluesent wrote: »
    Who will the short-sellers turn on next?.
    Merrill Lynch is odds on to be the next target.
    Krusty & Phil Madoff, 1990 - 2007:
    "Buy now because house prices only ever go UP, UP, UP."
  • I ask about soros because he declared earlier but I presume he could have sold up since then without us knowing?. The july dip has been exceeded recently and I presume he would have sold like anyone else though surely someone would know who he sold 3% or whatever it was, to
    I just don't see the US Government letting that happen despite it being the right thing, probably.

    I see it as a positive move, it has to stop somewhere. I dont expect the s&p500 to plunge but again this is just my guess
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    Would seem a good idea to move from 5% of assets in bullion gold to more like 20%. Rather quickly.
  • Preparations being made in U.S. for insolvency protection for Lehmans according to the BBC (pretty obvious anyway).

    If no new financing is found before Wall Street opens on Monday, Lehman will have to seek so-called Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

    In the UK, accountancy firm PWC has been lined up to run the British operations of Lehman.
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    There is no way that Lehmans will just go bust. Unwinding the derrivatives contracts would finish off just about every financial institution worldwide.

    Someone will be found to take on the liabilities of Lehmans in some shape or another. That someone may well be the US taxpayer.
  • BBC News is saying Barclays and Bank of America have pulled out of discussions. But Sky News is rumouring that Bank of America is about to save Lehman Bros. I wonder who is right.
    Krusty & Phil Madoff, 1990 - 2007:
    "Buy now because house prices only ever go UP, UP, UP."
  • The US government is signalling that it won't step in.

    The BBC's Robert Peston sounds like he expects liquidation, in spite of Generali's observations.

    PWC is said to be lined up and ready to go for the administration of the UK based assets.

    Any guesses for the % falls tomorrow on the FTSE & Wall Street?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.