We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

So much for the Governments 'rescue' package

13»

Comments

  • Has there been any more information released regarding the "free" five year loans.

    I would love to read the fine print on this deal. I guess the fine detail will probably be an after thought and pop up sometime during the pre-budget report
  • "However, it is important to remember that mortgage rescue is only part of a range of options the Government has put in place to help families at risk of repossession, including expanding free legal representation at county courts, more free debt and advice, and on-going work with lenders to help ensure repossession is only ever a last resort."

    Am I reading that right? The government are offering "more free debt" as a solution to... erh debt? Actually, that does sound about right.
  • somi wrote: »
    if you are on 5% deal at most banks should be considerate, understanding and either retain the same rate or at most 0.5% higher if they think borrower can afford that, simple as that,.

    And why on earth should that happen?
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    somi wrote: »
    To save off repossesion and make life easier for thoes struggling, banks should not put people into these expensive SVR deals as it causes hardship and some people just can't afford it, this applies today more than ever since lot of people in the last 2-3 years took mortgages either beyond their means or have lost job or cut back on their salary combined with higher cost of living these days, if you are on 5% deal at most banks should be considerate, understanding and either retain the same rate or at most 0.5% higher if they think borrower can afford that, simple as that,

    and thoes with equity should be retained as much as possible. i also think some fees are too expensive for remortgaging. banks are getting their money anyway if they retain the rate and at the same time securing their lending if they show more consideration to the borrower by not switching to SVR which never should be above 6% anyway.

    To be fair to somi's post - this is what an awful lot of the general public think.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.