We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Taylor Wimpey hit by massive loss
Comments
-
justpurchased wrote: »No but a sucessfull company will survive a dowturn in its sector. it happens to all companies but you would not know yet being a uni boy.
I guess I haven't lost enough money to be considered successful (by you) :rotfl:--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
-
We`ve just had an eight year run of boominig house prices with the greedy builders forcing up prices and their profits at every chance.
How can this lot whine about loss of profits when they`ve made record profits for the past seven/eight years by ripping off Joe Public.
My heart beeds for them.
I'm sorry, but that's business. When you sell your house, or your car, or your whatever, do you not try to get as much as you can for it, or do you think "my Ford Focus will sell at £5,000 so I'll sell it for £2,000 because that's fairer".
And how is that any different from a buyer paying as little as they can? Do you hear people on here saying "I have seen a house I can negotiate down to £150,000" only for others to say "no, pay £175,000, that's fairer".
The seller sells for as much as possible, the buyer buys for as little as possible (contained of course by what he can pay) and the end result (the balance between the two pulling in opposite directions) is the market price.
Where the system has fallen over is that banks have given the buyer far too much spending power, more than in many cases can be paid back, and certainly more than is sustainable. Give everyone twice as much money and they don't all end up with twice as big a house, they end up with the same house at twice the cost as the market adjusts. That balance between buyer and seller pulling in opposite directions again.
Now the banks have run out of cash so the public has less spending power so prices must drop.
Not defending the builders here, but trying to give a little perspective. Suggesting "well they should have just sold the houses for less than they could have got, it's all their fault" is naive in the extreme!Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards