We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Councils want power to offer mortgages

Telegraph

Apparently they held 600,000 mortgages in 1980 before deregulation. Remember them? When women weren't allowed mortgage finance because they were expected to get married and start a family.

"......In a joint letter [ to GB], [the local authorities] argue the public sector should be able to support first-time buyers and offer "new mortgage capacity" alongside private lenders, preventing a collapse in the market and restoring stability....."
«134

Comments

  • lostinrates
    lostinrates Posts: 55,283 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    Telegraph

    Apparently they held 600,000 mortgages in 1980 before deregulation. Remember them? When women weren't allowed mortgage finance because they were expected to get married and start a family.

    "......In a joint letter [ to GB], [the local authorities] argue the public sector should be able to support first-time buyers and offer "new mortgage capacity" alongside private lenders, preventing a collapse in the market and restoring stability....."

    does that suggest they could afford more frequent rubbish collection but are putting money aside for this??:rolleyes: I wonder if motivation to not have property tax bands downgraded is part of this?
  • baby_boomer
    baby_boomer Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    That and the fact that in Leeds, for instance, there are no Council Houses left! It's easier to fulfil their functions by offering mortgages than by offering houses.

    To build more would put up your Council Tax even faster than the public sector pension bill already has.
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    If councils start offering mortgages as well then won't this keep prices high??? :confused:
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    just another thing for councils to mismanage - the resulting losses being recouped through increased council tax.

    no thanks.

    how about instead, councils actually pull their fingers out and make available all of the empty housing they own as council housing, rather than letting it sit there to rot whilst the country suffers from housing shortage.
  • As far as I remember the councils used to do a pretty good job of managing mortgages where I come from. They didn't just lend on council property - this was before RTB. Friends of my parents had a fixed rate mortgage from them in about 1972/3 - fixed for 25 years, can't remember the rate, but people thought they were mad. Guess who had the last laugh.
  • baby_boomer
    baby_boomer Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Well if you fix a long term rate before mega-inflation goes into overdrive then I guess it doesn't matter who you borrowed from.

    Unless, in this example, you were a ratepayer whose council had just handed out a free money ticket to someone else ;).

    If Councils entered the current mortgage market it might make it more difficult for current mortgage lenders, which includes HM Government & the taxpayer at Northern Rock, to break even.

    Unless the Councils were offering to take on NR's 125% mortgages :rotfl:
  • mewbie_2
    mewbie_2 Posts: 6,058 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think councils (OK States) in the US have been seriously burnt by the property markets. Why would anyone entrust such responsibility to a load of nepotistic slackers who couldn't get a job in the real world.
  • baby_boomer
    baby_boomer Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    At least in the US they are responsible for their own finances, whereas in the UK 80% of their finance comes from central government which pulls the strings for political purposes.
  • What is needed is more council-owned homes. These could be provided by building new housing estates (100% council owned), compulsory purchase of unused houses or by snapping up selected bargains at the auctions.

    Then, after paying the equivalent of £££s in Housing Benefit, at least they would own the house.

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • napoleon
    napoleon Posts: 611 Forumite
    yes, whack the cost of it onto the council tax - the cure for all financial ills.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.