We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BBC News: America's house price time bomb
Comments
-
Dithering_Dad wrote: »It was those magnolia walls and well placed accessories so beloved of the House Doctor.
http://www.housedoctor.co.uk/courses/000567.php
I bet I cant find that thread now it was over a year ago, but boy did I PSML and Im sure I made a somewhat caustic statement of "imagine how many boxes of candles and river stones you could buy for 895+vat" :rolleyes::beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
Laminate floor, of course. Laminated the floors, ceilings and the walls, even the cat!0
-
Can I just say that the banks are not going to be allowed to go bust on a widespread basis. There are two reasons for this:
1. The chairman of the Fed is an academic who specialised in the Depression era. He is well aware that the main cause of this was the demise of so many banks at that time. He is not going to repeat the same mistake. The lesson has been learned worldwide.
2. We can't run the country without banks. In fact, without them, we would be back in the stone age (or at least the middle ages) incredibly quickly. This country currently has a population of 60 million. With an agricultural economy in the middle ages, it supported 2 million. Consequently, rather than letting all the banks go bust and then having to start up new ones, it makes much more sense for the government simply to declare them solvent - with a govt solvency guarantee if necessary. You can grumble about the cost of this coming from the pockets of people still working, but the alternative is simply too dreadful.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards