We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Where to go for Buy to Let deal?
Comments
-
er.. have we gone back to 2004? Are you serious about BTL?
Cost of property - 110,000?
Rent 525 (says the shark) less 11% = c. 475.
Cost of interest 7% on 110,000 = 7,700 per year
Max income - no voids, repairs = 4,750 per year.
It doesn't seem to make financial sense to me, perhaps I am missing something.
Mewbie - you are obviously on a crusade on house purchasers - this will surely lead to an increase in demand for rental properties, increasing rental incomes.
With regard to your figures I would guess that you re-read the original posts as they are only looking to raise £75k, on a property which they already own, and is currently mortgage free.
Using your interest rate of 7% on £75000 = £5250 p.a
£5250/12 = £437.50 per month, so assuming no voids or repairs a profit of £37.50 p.m.
Whilst I think that property prices will obviously reduce significantly, and hopefully they do to stimulate the market, because us mortgage advisers want to be very busy again, I don't think houses in the £100k price range will drop to £65k because as we can see on the figures above these will be gobbled up by the BTL investors as they would pay for themselves - creating more demand for rental properties.0 -
Tiidler Thanks.
Yes I agree that on a BTL basis, they would pay for themselves.
But I need some help in finding a suitable BTL product. Any specific products spring to mind?
Would I still need a survey etc? What legal fees would I pay?
Least I would save paying the EA commission!0 -
As I don't know enough about your circumstances to give advice - based purely on the info available, Woolwich offer a lifetime tracker at 6.59%, with a 1.5% fee, but free legals & free val. I'm not 100% sure if they class mortgaging a "mortgage free" property as a remortgage.
Nat West do a fixed rate at 6.89% for 5 years with a £1499 fee, again free val & legal.0 -
Tiddler and co, can you guys help.
The chain are prepared to negotiate, I am potentially asking for them to knock up to £20K off.
The purchase price would be £100K
Mortgage say £75K
Leave £25K in.
Woolwich tracker, 6.99% over 25 years is £407 per month. potential profit element of £50 per month.
What do you think?0 -
I have in my possession some books on buy to let (yes I was interested briefly a few years back). There are a couple of things that stick out.
1. Professionals buy to make money on the yield, any capital rise a bonus. Risking 100k to make £50 month does not look good value to me?
2. A rough rule of thumb is rent x 100 = purchase price. Seriously. That makes a 500 month rental worth 50,000.
That is why the market is so far out of line with any sanity.0 -
With regard to your figures I would guess that you re-read the original posts as they are only looking to raise £75k, on a property which they already own, and is currently mortgage free.
But if it's worth £115k, then you have to factor in the cost of losing the use of the property.
Which in this case is the extra £40k that they could release by selling the whole lot, rather than renting it out.
So you need to compare not the cost of borrowing £75k with the rent, but the cost of borrowing £75k, plus the cost of losing the interest on £40k in the bank, with the rent.Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!0 -
I have in my possession some books on buy to let
I have those as well!
What seems to escape some BTL investors is the yield on their investment and the concept of risk/reward ratios.Living Sober.
Some methods A.A. members have used for not drinking.
"A simple book for complicated people"0 -
RecoveringAlcoholic wrote: »I have those as well!
What seems to escape some BTL investors is the yield on their investment and the concept of risk/reward ratios.
Would the yield in this example come from the house price increase in x amount of years?0 -
Financial_Savvy wrote: »Would the yield in this example come from the house price increase in x amount of years?
No offence intended, Financial Savvy, but you really do need to learn about the lettings business. Its a BUSINESS. I own a number of properties and have been a landlord for many years (far predating the BTL frenzy). What you are wanting to do (like so many before) is buy a property, hand over the actual running of the business (the letting part) to a LA, and live in hope of house price increase. That is not a good strategy, and hasn't been for the last four years or so. Its also potentially the path to financial problems, especially if you have a relatively low income of £22k.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards