slicethepie-AG8

LS13_G

on track for another fiver today. on £2.15 at the minute. im on 2 stars and have 83.5% accuracy should be on 3 stars soon, 7p a track would be better.

word is the next scout rooms fee's paid for each track is gonna be smaller with the increase of members

The_Edible_Dormouse

LS13_G wrote: »

on track for another fiver today. on £2.15 at the minute. im on 2 stars and have 83.5% accuracy should be on 3 stars soon, 7p a track would be better.

word is the next scout rooms fee's paid for each track is gonna be smaller with the increase of members

Well, if it keeps STP running, I can live with that, as long as the two stars don't go below 3p...or even if they keep it as it is, and make it much harder to move up a star. Either works. I'd rather see STP keep running with a slightly smaller incentive than close down.

LS13_G

AYE AGREED. ON £3 now whooop.

Ashok_2

Does anyone have info on exactly when you gain a star? E.g. after how many reviews etc..

Thanks so much

LS13_G

i got my 2nd star when i was on 78% accuracy and after around 50-100 reviews

LS13_G

ive just had a few times were its said no more songs to review but there is more if i re join the scout room nearly on the fiver about 3 tracks away had £17.36 in free cash so far

sophie131

I got WELL distracted today, so it's just as well that work phoned me up and cancelled my overtime for tomorrow, result! So, I will try and do a £5 worth tonight and £10 tomorrow.

milliemonster

I'm starting to get a bit hacked off with the people running STP, firstly they suspended my account for a couple of days cos they said my reviews weren't constructive enough, fair enough I thought but some of the tracks on there are total crap! (how can you put that nicely???)

Next, whenever I log in I now have no tracks to review, when I email them about it it seems I have done so many reviews that I have exhausted them all and will now have to wait until August when AG9 opens, this is despite the fact my hubby is still reviewing tracks and there are loads that I haven't done.

So, as I'm a bit quicker than hubby, I've been in on his username to review on his behalf, still doing a fiver a day and now they have emaled him saying that they are clamping down on reviews and 80% of his reviews are too similar so 'sort it or your account and earnings will be suspended'

FOR GOD SAKE!!! when you have reviewed over 500 songs, how are you supposed to make every single one completely different? there are only so many ways of saying something is rubbish (constructively of course) or that something is brilliant and each track gets a different rating. I am beginning to think that they are just not happy with anyone who is earning a fair bit on here.

So, can anyone give me any pointers on different ways of describing a poor or good track?, I usually go along the lines of 'vocals sung with passion/vocals a bit weak in places' 'good melody with nice catchy/funky beat/vibe' or 'good musical arrangement', 'good relaxing track, nice to chill out to in late evening', so what am I doing wrong?????

ThinkingOfLinking

I am over 90% accuracy again now, at long last. And still scouting...

LS13_G

what i tend to do is use the same bases on which to rate the song.
the vocals, instruments used, whether it all clicks and sounds good. is it catchy, the song length, whether or not the vocalists or the instrumental is good , what improvements maybe. i jus do that but review each track bby starting with a different subject, really truely and honestly i talk aload of !!!!!!!! and dont even know what im talking about lol