We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Appeal on wrong road name - rejected because sign is visible in photo

Hello all,

I have read the sticky post and I sent an appeal letter to CPM for my parking charge notice. I apologise if this matter has been previously discussed somewhere and I have missed it. My car was parked on Panfield mews in Gants hill while the ticket says the location is Cranbook road (which is the adjacent road). I appealed on the basis of this. I stated that the car is no where near cranbook road. But they have sent a rejection letter saying that the signs are visible in the photographic evidence and they circled it in yellow. And since the driver left the car in that car park, he/she has the responsibility to abide by the signs. And I noted that even in the rejection letter the location is stated as cranbook road.
This seems confusing to me, should I appeal to POPLA or should I pay as the photos have signs visible on them?
All help is much appreciated.

Thank you
Bala

Comments

  • Fruitcake
    Fruitcake Posts: 59,529 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Please confirm the name of the parking company as there are several with similar initials.

    If you have a PoPLA code you should use it, but that assumes CPM, whoever they are, are BPA members.
    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,225 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Please give us the full name of the parking company. There are two with similar acronyms, but if it is either, there is no access for you to POPLA. The only 2nd stage appeal service open to you will be the IAS as both are IPC operators.

    Before raising any hopes on a 2nd appeal - please read the NEWBIES FAQ sticky, post #3 about the futility of appealing to the IAS.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Thank you for pointing that out.
    Yes it is CPM (UK Car Park Management)
    Yeah I have read the bit of IAS appeals, they do sound like part of the same team.
    Do you guys think I have good grounds to appeal? Will incorrect road name be prioritised over visible signs?
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,225 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Do you guys think I have good grounds to appeal? Will incorrect road name be prioritised over visible signs?
    Perhaps with a council parking ticket, but highly unlikely with a private parking ticket. Only a judge can give you a definitive answer.

    In considering whether or not to appeal to the IAS, please bear in mind that you have only around a 17% chance of success (last year in their Annual Report, the IAS stated that 83% of appeals were dismissed).

    In addition, and importantly in my view, if your appeal is dismissed, this will give UKCPM added impetus and evidence (that an ‘independent’ appeals service also dismissed your appeal) to file a court claim. They are litigious and don’t need any excuse to sue.

    http://www.bmpa.eu/companydata/UK_Car_Park_Management.html

    If you work on the basis that they will issue court proceedings, it’s best they don’t have the IAS backing to support their case.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.