Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@. Skimlinks & other affiliated links are turned on

Search
  • FIRST POST
    • Arnie91
    • By Arnie91 5th Oct 17, 12:56 PM
    • 14Posts
    • 0Thanks
    Arnie91
    My insurance company defeated a fraudulent claim but incurred fees? Who is liable?
    • #1
    • 5th Oct 17, 12:56 PM
    My insurance company defeated a fraudulent claim but incurred fees? Who is liable? 5th Oct 17 at 12:56 PM
    Hey All,
    I will give you the background to this, but I'm wondering who may be liable for my insurance companies 'legal costs' in order to defeat a claim made against myself.

    Back in 2015 I was involved in a tiny collision in London where some rough rowdy driver cut into traffic and caused me to bump his rear bumper. Initially there was no damage at all, pictures can confirm this. The guy then ends up claiming on my insurance some weeks later with a bill from BMW for £3000 for a completely new rear bumper due to the claim that a 'rivet' has been damaged and cut in half, alongside personal injury claims. This rivet had some microscopic damage that no one could see by eye, or so I was told.

    My insurance sent out an engineer to both parties and told me that the claim was highly suspicious and that they would be fighting it.

    Here are some of the details.
    XS Direct Underwriter, One call Broker. £3,000 excess, £3,000 a year insurance. I know it's daylight robbery but I started driving young with a fairly large size engine car. Luckily after three years that's down to about £1,000 a year with the same company but my car's been off the road for the past year while it's had the front end rebuilt.

    Months and a year passed, I was not contacted or anything. I called them in 2016 in order to try and get NCB letter from them but was told that this same chap had closed the 2015 case for damage and had reopened another case almost a year later claiming personal injury for himself and three other individuals that were not in the car. I was told that since I was insured from 2015 and 2016, if the claim was in the first two years I would not have any NCB. I later realised that I had also been insured with them in 2014. So I contacted them again and explained this to my call handler, who was with XS direct (the underwriter), she explained that she would contact One call (the broker, however I didn't realise the difference nor was it explained) and that they would be able to sort this out.

    I didn't hear back anything until calling them up, it's now october 2017. Today I found out they defeated the claim back in March 2017 (No contact or emails regarding this update), but had to instruct their solicitors and incurred costs of up to 1600 pounds. The reason I called is that the car in question just underwent a front end rebuild with upgraded parts and I went to put my car on autotrader and it told me it was marked as a CAT D. I was extremely angry because I've just shelled out thousands on parts and tools to get this done.

    They told me on the phone that they don't know why it's marked as a CAT D but that they would get this removed by this afternoon. Good result.

    The issue is that my call handler will be calling on Monday to explain them recovering the legal costs. Now I knew this claim was fraudulent and was not accepting any fault. But I was never told they were going to instruct solicitors.

    Now that the case is defeated, who is liable for my insurance companies legal costs. My initial thought is that surely it's the other parties insurance company that needs to pay this as their client tried to fraudulently claim on my insurance for bogus injury and zero damage to his car. On the phone the chap also explained that my excess was 'All sections'. I don't know what this is but One-call never explained this to me, they just explained to me that in the event I was in an accident and other party claimed, I would have to pay upfront the costs on my own claim, or any other parties claim, if that were the case and I had won a non-fault situation I would be reimbursed the up-front cost.

    I don't like the way I was sold insurance by One-call and never explained or told that my insurance is with XS Direct. I remember the first time calling One-call and they didn't even know who I was, subsequently I learned that if I had any claims or insurance issue that One-call would not handle it, that I had to go direct to XS-direct.

    Am i right in thinking that this other party should be covering the legal costs for my insurance solicitors considering the claim was defeated, it was fraudulent and I am innocent. I was also not informed of my insurance companies decision to use solicitors. Must be that juicy £3,000 guaranteed cover...

    P.s I'm pretty sure I have some kind of silver package legal cover so I'm trying to find that asap.
    Last edited by Arnie91; 05-10-2017 at 1:32 PM.
Page 1
    • FutureGirl
    • By FutureGirl 5th Oct 17, 6:22 PM
    • 949 Posts
    • 380 Thanks
    FutureGirl
    • #2
    • 5th Oct 17, 6:22 PM
    • #2
    • 5th Oct 17, 6:22 PM
    How did you buy the policy? One call are a broker, it says on their website they use a variety of underwriters, and your documentation would have noted who your underwriter was.

    Your issue will how they sold the policy, and them defending the claim are 2 different things. In terms of your excess - everything about that will be detailed in the policy documents.

    Put it this way, if they didn't defend the claim, they would have had to pay out for the claim. If the judge has awarded your insurers costs, then the other party will pay them, if not, then your insurers will pay the costs.
    • dacouch
    • By dacouch 5th Oct 17, 7:25 PM
    • 20,227 Posts
    • 12,473 Thanks
    dacouch
    • #3
    • 5th Oct 17, 7:25 PM
    • #3
    • 5th Oct 17, 7:25 PM


    Put it this way, if they didn't defend the claim, they would have had to pay out for the claim. If the judge has awarded your insurers costs, then the other party will pay them, if not, then your insurers will pay the costs.
    Originally posted by FutureGirl
    The OP has a £3000 ALL SECTIONS excess, he will pay any costs upto the £3000
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

2,126Posts Today

8,767Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • I was surprised to see the three people in front of me in the newsagents were all shocked their old £1 coins were no longer taken.

  • RT @natdebtline: If you?ve been visited by a bailiff since April 2014 we want to hear your story for our #bailiffreform campaign https://t.?

  • Well so far it seems there's one thing remainers and leavers agree on - the EU is getting the better of the negotia? https://t.co/70z5ffpG8S

  • Follow Martin