Your browser isn't supported
It looks like you're using an old web browser. To get the most out of the site and to ensure guides display correctly, we suggest upgrading your browser now. Download the latest:

Welcome to the MSE Forums

We're home to a fantastic community of MoneySavers but anyone can post. Please exercise caution & report spam, illegal, offensive or libellous posts/messages: click "report" or email forumteam@.

    • modgit
    • By modgit 3rd Oct 17, 8:52 PM
    • 656Posts
    • 510Thanks
    Bank Park NTK received.
    • #1
    • 3rd Oct 17, 8:52 PM
    Bank Park NTK received. 3rd Oct 17 at 8:52 PM
    My son has received a Notice to Keeper from Bank Park Management who are IPC registered - dated 14/09/17 relating to a car park on 18/08/17.

    I've looked through the threads on here and have come up with the following, I would value any opinions on it. I assume the fact they were out of the time limit is not enough on its own?

    Thank you

    "You issued a parking notice on 14/09/2017 addressed to myself as the registered keeper of the vehicle. I decline your invitation to name the driver, which is not required of me as the keeper of the vehicle and no assumptions can be drawn. Your demand for payment is declined for the following reasons.

    1. There is no keeper liability.
    Under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, 9. (5) The relevant period for the purposes of sub-paragraph (4) is the period of 14 days beginning with the day after that on which the specified period of parking ended. Also in the IPC Code of Practice Part C, 5.1 (m)

    Date of parking 18/08/2017, so the Parking Charge Notice would need to have been received no later than the 1/09/2017. The parking charge notice was only issued on the 14/09/2017 and deemed given on the 16/09/2017, 16 days after the deadline and therefore as the keeper of the vehicle, I am not liable.

    2. If this appeal is rejected, I will only appeal further if you offer an alternative dispute resolution service. The 'IAS' offered by IPC firms will not be used, for well-documented reasons.

    3. If this appeal is rejected please provide the following documentation:
    a. Who is the party that contracted with your company and are they the landowner?
    b. Is your charge based on damages for breach of contract? Answer yes or no.
    c. Please provide photos of the signs that you say were on site, which you contend formed a contract with the driver.
    d. Please provide all photographs taken of this vehicle.
    e. Please provide proof that the timing of any camera or timer used was synchronised with all other cameras and/or systems & machines.

    Do not send debt collector letters and do not add any costs, which would be a thinly-veiled attempt at 'double recovery'. I will not respond to debt collectors and to involve a third party would be a failure to mitigate your costs as well as deliberate and knowing misuse of my data.

    As you have obtained the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause (as you have not fully complied with the IPC Code of Practice) please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach. Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me. I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle.

    I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.

    Is it ok? Thanks
Page 1
    • Coupon-mad
    • By Coupon-mad 4th Oct 17, 12:03 AM
    • 50,577 Posts
    • 63,955 Thanks
    • #2
    • 4th Oct 17, 12:03 AM
    • #2
    • 4th Oct 17, 12:03 AM
    Yes that's good - nice research. They won't cancel but it sends them a signal from the keeper, and looks very reasonable on your son's part if they try a small claim eventually (always defendable!).

    I assume the fact they were out of the time limit is not enough on its own?
    No, because these firms just pretend they can 'assume' the keeper was the driver and they hope the keeper (and any future Judge) doesn't know any different.

    The entire industry is rotten, as your research will no doubt have shown you. Once your son has sent that and got the inevitable rejection letter of drivel, he should make a written complaint to the local MP.

    Read this copy of a post by Bargepole and please encourage your son, a genuine and honest person who has come up against a scam industry, to write a letter to your MP:

    "Some action at last:

    This Private Member's Bill has Government and cross-party support, and stands a good chance of making it into statute.

    The full text of the clauses will be published nearer the date of the second reading, but my sources tell me it's something we should support.

    Now would be a good time to write to your MP urging them to support it."
    PRIVATE PCN? DON'T PAY BUT DO NOT IGNORE IT TWO Clicks needed for advice:
    Top of the page: Home>>Forums>Household & Travel>Motoring>Parking Tickets, Fines & Parking - read the 'NEWBIES' FAQS thread!
    Advice to ignore is WRONG, unless in Scotland/NI.

    • modgit
    • By modgit 4th Oct 17, 9:29 AM
    • 656 Posts
    • 510 Thanks
    • #3
    • 4th Oct 17, 9:29 AM
    • #3
    • 4th Oct 17, 9:29 AM
    Thank you, I'll read that and address MP afterwards.

    Again, thanks for your advice.
Welcome to our new Forum!

Our aim is to save you money quickly and easily. We hope you like it!

Forum Team Contact us

Live Stats

1,815Posts Today

7,903Users online

Martin's Twitter
  • Common question, but actually its pretty meaningless - the amount to govt is arbitrary - i explain why here...?

  • RT @avantiproperty: @MartinSLewis You've got too much time on your hands.

  • Today's Twitter poll: Bit out of no where this one. If you wear a watch which wrist is it on...

  • Follow Martin