We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Not parked wholly within bay
Skip_Offwork
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hello members, you'll be pleased to hear I have waded through the Newbie advice, but I still feel in need of a little direction..
I've just had a postal PCN from LDK security group (BPA member) about a "not parked wholly within bay" event on 28th Feb i.e. 102 days ago. I did buy and display a valid parking ticket, which amazingly I still possess. No windscreen ticket was issued at the time. There is a photo of my car, which doesn't show a windscreen ticket or any bay markings. There is also an illegible photo of the car park signage, so I can't tell you what it actually says.
Now obviously I will respond with the online appeal form, but there are a number of grounds here - should I use one or all? Which is the most likely to succeed and get these parasites off my back?
Thanks for your help,
Skip.
I've just had a postal PCN from LDK security group (BPA member) about a "not parked wholly within bay" event on 28th Feb i.e. 102 days ago. I did buy and display a valid parking ticket, which amazingly I still possess. No windscreen ticket was issued at the time. There is a photo of my car, which doesn't show a windscreen ticket or any bay markings. There is also an illegible photo of the car park signage, so I can't tell you what it actually says.
Now obviously I will respond with the online appeal form, but there are a number of grounds here - should I use one or all? Which is the most likely to succeed and get these parasites off my back?
Thanks for your help,
Skip.
0
Comments
-
All. Do not mess with it unless you know what you're doing!Now obviously I will respond with the online appeal form, but there are a number of grounds here - should I use one or all?
None of them! Surely that came out from reading the sticky? You'll need to get POPLA to cancel this - or a landowner cancellation.Which is the most likely to succeed and get these parasites off my back?
Does the NtK state they are pursuing the keeper under the auspices of PoFA 2012?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Thanks. The PCN doesn't say anything about PoFA 2012.
But I understand I have to start with the LDK online form.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards