Main site > MoneySavingExpert.com Forums > Household & Travel > Motoring > Parking Tickets, Fines & Parking > Parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to ... (Page 1)

IMPORTANT! This is MoneySavingExpert's open forum - anyone can post

Please exercise caution & report any spam, illegal, offensive, racist, libellous post to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com

  • Be nice to all MoneySavers
  • All the best tips go in the MoneySavingExpert weekly email

    Plus all the new guides, deals & loopholes

  • No spam/referral links
or Login with Facebook
Parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to a dropped footway
Closed Thread
Views: 11,726
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
# 1
rashid
Old 02-02-2010, 1:45 AM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Default Parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to a dropped footway

Hello friends,

I have received a parking ticket from Sutton council of £100 pounds with a 50% concession if paid within 14 days, while parked outside my home on a road which has street parking.

There is a sign which says controlled zone ends and apart from that there are no signs or lines whatsoever and people park where there is a space left. My car was parked on the left side where there is a dropped footpath and on left is a foot-way. Cyclists, buggies, wheelchair users and people on foot use it. My car was parked near there but the dropped footpath goes further ahead of my car and people do not have difficulty in going round the car including an cyclists etc.

Furthermore everyone parks there including me and never got any tickets. I took pictures of my car as well as another car parks in same spot next day with had not been given any ticket.

Also a fine of £100 is too steep anyway.
I am happy to post the pics.
Can someone help me?
Thanks
Rashid
rashid is offline
Report Post
# 2
peter_the_piper
Old 02-02-2010, 8:05 AM
Deliciously Dedicated Diehard MoneySaving Devotee
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: sunny sussex
Posts: 16,940
Default

Host on tinypic, put the url on here minus the http:// bit. Both sides of paperwork please.
Children are forever not just Christmas.
peter_the_piper is online now
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to peter_the_piper For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 3
TheBogsDollocks
Old 13-02-2010, 1:26 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Include the following paragraphs in your appeal;

“Council areas within Greater London that were awarded Special Parking Area status under section 76 of the Road Traffic Act 1991 are now considered, due to paragraph 1(5) of Schedule 10 within the TMA 2004, to be Special Enforcement Areas.

However, such council areas are not considered as Special Enforcement Areas where Statutory Instrument 2009/1116 is concerned. Paragraph 2(5) of S.I. 2009/1116 does not include paragraph 1(5) of Schedule 10 within the TMA 2004, in its definition of Special Enforcement Areas.

(5)In paragraph (4) a special enforcement area means an area designated as a special enforcement area by means of
(a) an order made under paragraph 1(1) or 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004; or
(b)an order which, by virtue of paragraph 2(5) or 3(5) of that Schedule, has effect as if it were an order so made."

Since S.I. 2009/1116 does not include those councils within Greater London that were granted Special Parking Area status under the 1991 Act, it means that those councils do not qualify as being exempt from having to place traffic signs for the purpose of providing information to road users as to the effect of section 85 or 86 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 in their area.

As the prohibition was not signed and no exemption from placing traffic signs has been granted, I require you to cancel this penalty charge forthwith.
TheBogsDollocks is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to TheBogsDollocks For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 4
Coblcris
Old 13-02-2010, 2:40 PM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,812
Default

Which contravention is alleged ?
Coblcris is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to Coblcris For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 5
Ian2709
Old 28-03-2010, 2:05 PM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Default

TheBogsDollocks, would that reply that you gave work in my case. I live in Waltham Forest, East London and by the sound of it, my partner was ticketed for virtually the same violation as rashid. There is no indication that it is a violation to park where she did. I have put together an appeal with photo evidence and if quoting those paragraphs will help I'll use them.

Also do you know if there is a time bracket that wardens can issue tickets? she was given two, one at 19.42 and one at 06.32.
Ian2709 is offline
Report Post
# 6
TheBogsDollocks
Old 28-03-2010, 5:49 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian2709 View Post
TheBogsDollocks, would that reply that you gave work in my case. I live in Waltham Forest, East London and by the sound of it, my partner was ticketed for virtually the same violation as rashid. There is no indication that it is a violation to park where she did. I have put together an appeal with photo evidence and if quoting those paragraphs will help I'll use them.
Yes the argument is valid for any London Borough. This argument has been used a few times now with success. However, the argument tends only to be accepted once an appeal is set to go before an adjudicator when the council pull out. They would not like an adjudicator to validate my argument as that would prohibit the councils from enforcing dropped footways and double parking until the restriction is either signed or a signage exemption is granted via statute.
TheBogsDollocks is offline
Report Post
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheBogsDollocks For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 7
Coupon-mad
Old 29-03-2010, 12:11 AM
Deliciously Dedicated Diehard MoneySaving Devotee
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 26,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian2709 View Post
TheBogsDollocks, would that reply that you gave work in my case. I live in Waltham Forest, East London and by the sound of it, my partner was ticketed for virtually the same violation as rashid. There is no indication that it is a violation to park where she did. I have put together an appeal with photo evidence and if quoting those paragraphs will help I'll use them.

Also do you know if there is a time bracket that wardens can issue tickets? she was given two, one at 19.42 and one at 06.32.


There are guidelines that say that there is supposed to be 24 hours between PCNs, this has been mentioned before on pepipoo.com and if I were you I would start a new thread over there. Read the READ THIS FIRST sticky and then register and post your thread and images:

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=30

AFAIK there is nothing to suggest that the 24 hours ends at midnight (otherwise a CEO could issue a ticket at 11.55pm and another 6 minutes later for the same contravention). Obviously this would not be acceptable practice.

Post on your new thread on pepipoo, pics of the front and back of both the PCNs and any letters received. Plus pics of the bay lines and signs, including the ends of the bay (are they double or single lines at either end and is the bay divided or one long continuous bay?). All that info should get you some helpful responses for wording your appeals to both PCNs.

Include in both informal appeals, TheBogsDollocks' wording - and in the second PCN appeal include the fact that it's a procedural impropriety for a second PCN to be issued for the same contravention within 24 hours. Also include anything the pepipoo experts give you.

Then I think the Council may see sense and cancel the second PCN (maybe!) but I expect they'll refuse the informal appeal on the first one as they rarely fold at that stage. You'll then have a formal appeal chance at NTO stage (pepipoo posters will advise further if you have a good case to continue).

HTH
Ticket in a private car park in England/Wales?... DON'T PAY IT BUT DO NOT IGNORE IT- the advice changed in 2012/13!

CLICK on '>Parking Tickets, Fines & Parking>' end of the small blue 'Home>Forums>' link, top of the page, to see current threads.
Do NOT read older advice to ignore, unless it was in Scotland or NI.

Last edited by Coupon-mad; 29-03-2010 at 12:13 AM.
Coupon-mad is online now
Report Post
# 8
Coblcris
Old 29-03-2010, 9:05 AM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,812
Default

The days do 'tick over' at midnight.
Although issuance a few minutes before midnight and a few minutes after would be good grounds to contest that one of the PCNs should be dropped in this case the timings are not such in my opinion. Each will have to be contested on its merits.
Coblcris is offline
Report Post
# 9
roddydogs
Old 29-03-2010, 10:19 AM
Fantastically Fervent MoneySaving Super Fan
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,118
Default

Blocking any part of a dropped kerb is a 24/7 offence, as is footpath parking, obstruction, etc. so the controlled zone is irellevant, as is the argument "Ive done it many times and not had a ticket/loads of people get away with it" type arguments.
roddydogs is offline
Report Post
# 10
flyingscotno1
Old 30-03-2010, 11:41 AM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBogsDollocks View Post
Include the following paragraphs in your appeal;

“Council areas within Greater London that were awarded Special Parking Area status under section 76 of the Road Traffic Act 1991 are now considered, due to paragraph 1(5) of Schedule 10 within the TMA 2004, to be Special Enforcement Areas.

However, such council areas are not considered as Special Enforcement Areas where Statutory Instrument 2009/1116 is concerned. Paragraph 2(5) of S.I. 2009/1116 does not include paragraph 1(5) of Schedule 10 within the TMA 2004, in its definition of Special Enforcement Areas.

(5)In paragraph (4) a special enforcement area means an area designated as a special enforcement area by means of
(a) an order made under paragraph 1(1) or 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004; or
(b)an order which, by virtue of paragraph 2(5) or 3(5) of that Schedule, has effect as if it were an order so made."

Since S.I. 2009/1116 does not include those councils within Greater London that were granted Special Parking Area status under the 1991 Act, it means that those councils do not qualify as being exempt from having to place traffic signs for the purpose of providing information to road users as to the effect of section 85 or 86 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 in their area.

As the prohibition was not signed and no exemption from placing traffic signs has been granted, I require you to cancel this penalty charge forthwith.
I had a look but I'm a bit confused by the argument here since Statutory Instrument 2009/1116 states "there is no requirement to place and maintain traffic signs to indicate the effect of sections 85 or 86 on roads in a special enforcement area".

It also states that "(5) In paragraph (4) a “special enforcement area” means an area designated as a special enforcement area by means of—

(a)an order made under paragraph 1(1) or 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004(4); or

(b)an order which, by virtue of paragraph 1(5) or 3(5) of that Schedule, has effect as if it were an order so made."


Since it states 1(5) surely it applies or that this been amended?
flyingscotno1 is offline
Report Post
# 11
roddydogs
Old 30-03-2010, 11:56 AM
Fantastically Fervent MoneySaving Super Fan
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,118
Default

Their Dosent have to be any signs for blocking dropped kerbs! or Footpath Parking, or Obstruction. Think about it! every dropped kerb would need one!
roddydogs is offline
Report Post
# 12
Coblcris
Old 30-03-2010, 4:15 PM
Serious MoneySaving Fan
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,812
Default

Which is why the argument used by TheBogsDollocks should be used.

The lack of approved signage not has prevented councils from issuing PCNs in the past.
Despite the councils and the Department of Transport being in full knowledge of the lacuna. In fact it has been hushed up in the past, again in full knowledge of the Councils and the Department of Transport. A sad commentary on the way parking enforcement operates.
Coblcris is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to Coblcris For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 13
ashirusnw
Old 25-10-2010, 12:43 PM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
Default Updated the ammendment to SI 2009/1116?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBogsDollocks View Post
Paragraph 2(5) of S.I. 2009/1116 does not include paragraph 1(5) of Schedule 10 within the TMA 2004, in its definition of Special Enforcement Areas.

(5)In paragraph (4) a special enforcement area means an area designated as a special enforcement area by means of
(a) an order made under paragraph 1(1) or 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004; or
(b)an order which, by virtue of paragraph 2(5) or 3(5) of that Schedule, has effect as if it were an order so made."

I think they may have updated the amendment to SI 2009/1116? It now reads:

Quote:
(5) In paragraph (4) a “special enforcement area” means an area designated as a special enforcement area by means of— (a)an order made under paragraph 1(1) or 3(1) of Schedule 10 to the Traffic Management Act 2004(2); or (b)an order which, by virtue of paragraph 1(5) or 3(5) of that Schedule, has effect as if it were an order so made.”
And so appears to include paragraphs 1(5) Am I right? all the best, Asher
ashirusnw is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to ashirusnw For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 14
TheBogsDollocks
Old 25-10-2010, 1:21 PM
MoneySaving Stalwart
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Yes that's right, the loophole was closed by a correction slip issued in Feb 2010. I only became aware of the correction in April 2010. At least it showed my argument was correct prior to Feb 2010 and it helped cancel a few unlawful PCN's since March 2008. Closure of the loophole was inevitable.

Oddly no councils in London have come publicly forward and admitted they served code 27 PCN's between March 2008 and Feb 2010 without the correct traffic signs being in place and announced that they intend to do the right thing and refund those who paid such PCN's. Why would this be do you think?
TheBogsDollocks is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to TheBogsDollocks For This Useful Post: Show me >>
# 15
Coupon-mad
Old 25-10-2010, 2:49 PM
Deliciously Dedicated Diehard MoneySaving Devotee
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 26,435
Default

ashirusnw, that doesn't mean there aren't grounds to win an appeal of a Council PCN though. There are plenty more errors made by Councils in their paperwork, procedures, lines and signs!

Most cases on pepipoo forums still win, Councils will bluff and bluster, declining an appeal without properly considering it - and then they fold before they get to the adjudicator in too many cases to count. If you have a Council PCN please post pics of all sides of your paperwork on a new thread on pepipoo.com:

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=30

HTH
Ticket in a private car park in England/Wales?... DON'T PAY IT BUT DO NOT IGNORE IT- the advice changed in 2012/13!

CLICK on '>Parking Tickets, Fines & Parking>' end of the small blue 'Home>Forums>' link, top of the page, to see current threads.
Do NOT read older advice to ignore, unless it was in Scotland or NI.
Coupon-mad is online now
Report Post
# 16
JMcredit
Old 14-09-2011, 1:09 PM
MoneySaving Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Default parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to a footway has anyone won the appeal

hi
Has anyone yet won the appeal for PCN issued for code 27
Parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to a dropped footway.
I am issued with a same PCN y'day in croydon. I had parked the car next to an open field (mainly used for dog walking etc. I parked the park all properly however just the back side tyre is slightly out of the raised kerb area. Having said that my car didn't obstruct anyone as the lowered kerb( footpath ) is quite big and i was only slightly out from raised kerb. there was no sign or traffic notice to stop people parking from here. I couldn't move the car further up as there was another car parked nfront of mine. Before i parked my car , the space was used by someone else. people are regularly parking here.

Is there any grounds for me to appeal against the ticket ....my car back wheel was only slightly out in dropped footway?

Do I have any grounds where PCN observation time and time contravention had only minute difference.



Best Regards
JMcredit is offline
Report Post
# 17
esmerobbo
Old 14-09-2011, 3:13 PM
Fantastically Fervent MoneySaving Super Fan
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 4,226
Default

Providing the dropped kerb is a dropped kerb then they don't need any other signs or road markings, the dropped kerb is the marking!
A photo of the kerb or street view location and post up both sides of your PCN personal details removed over on Pepipoo.
esmerobbo is offline
Report Post
The Following User Says Thank You to esmerobbo For This Useful Post: Show me >>
Closed Thread

Bookmarks
 
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 Forum Jump  

Contact Us - MoneySavingExpert.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 PM.

 Forum Jump  

Free MoneySaving Email

Top deals: Week of 27 August 2014

Get all this & more in MoneySavingExpert's weekly email full of guides, vouchers and Deals

GET THIS FREE WEEKLY EMAIL Full of deals, guides & it's spam free

Latest News & Blogs

Martin's Twitter Feed

profile
  • My point is less the rights and wrongs, more the tragic irony of the juxtaposition between the two.
  • We fail to intervene when 1,400 girls are sexually abused, but do intervene to imprison family trying to get treatment for their sick son.
  • Do you still print out your photos - PLEASE VOTE http://t.co/apAHZuhdIy

Cheap Travel Money

Find the best online rate for holiday cash with MSE's TravelMoneyMax.

Find the best online rate for your holiday cash with MoneySavingExpert's TravelMoneyMax.

TuneChecker Top Albums

  • ED SHEERANX (DELUXE EDITION)
  • VARIOUS ARTISTSNOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL MUSIC! 88
  • SAM SMITHIN THE LONELY HOUR (DELUXE EDITION)

MSE's Twitter Feed

profile
Always remember anyone can post on the MSE forums, so it can be very different from our opinion.
We use Skimlinks and other affiliated links in some of our boards, for some of our users.