PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Landlord selling / sold house need some legal advice
Options
Comments
-
Yep, that's correct.
Thank you for clarifying that.
May I ask, what is to stop a tenant from saying that they didn't receive a S21 or received it much later than they did?
(I know I sound stupid but I genuinely want to understand this issue once and for all because you won't believe the number of times that this would have been useful to know)0 -
and it is due to them and a few people here that lets Me know the S21 is most likely invalid0
-
PersianCatLady wrote: »Thank you for clarifying that.
May I ask, what is to stop a tenant from saying that they didn't receive a S21 or received it much later than they did?
(I know I sound stupid but I genuinely want to understand this issue once and for all because you won't believe the number of times that this would have been useful to know)
Notice is considered served 2 days after posting if using 1st class post.0 -
You ask for proof of posting at the post office when sending the letter. It is then legally defined as served two days later (1st class).0
-
-
Yes, I believe so.0
-
-
PersianCatLady wrote: »You would have thought that even if a LL didn't know the importance of getting the S21 correct, then the LA would.
No, you really wouldn't. You're assuming that LA's have some sort of training/qualifications but this isn't the case, you need absolutely no qualifications to become an LA, all responsibility falls on the landlord.0 -
-
What do you mean by 'most likely'? If I were you, I would want to be sure considering the risk you want to take going to court.
From what I know and from what people have said here it is definitely 100% invalid
I stated most likely because who knows what the judge will say on the day of court, they might think otherwise
I doubt they will say it is valid but who knows stranger things have happenedHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards