IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
go back to 2012
Options
pappa_golf
Posts: 8,895 Forumite
when the POFa came in , and the BPA set up an appeals service (no IPC then) was not one of the terms that they had an appeals scrutiny panel , without which they could not continue?
I note the ISPA is effectively no more , 40% or staff resigned and no chair person
I note the ISPA is effectively no more , 40% or staff resigned and no chair person
Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita
buy a share in crapita
0
Comments
-
pappa_golf wrote: »when the POFa came in , and the BPA set up an appeals service (no IPC then) was not one of the terms that they had an appeals scrutiny panel , without which they could not continue?
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225767/1205-independent-appeals-service.pdf0 -
we propose to transfer ,,,,,,,,,,,,
not quite independent , when ISPA staff are paid for by the BPA and have a broom cupboard at BPA headquarters
I would say a lack of IPSA should stop POPLa
Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
interesting when you look at the 3 remaining board members
Manny Rasores de Toro thought that name rang a bell
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/mannyrasoresdetoro
yup , a BPA director , https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/7f2uHQbeoYVApEMcPvLMBbpjymI/appointmentsSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
And when the Odious IPC weasels came on scene all talk of an independent scrutiny board was flushed down the toilet.
and to top it all they are claiming this on their so called appeals page:The Independent Appeals Service is approved by Government under the Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Competent Authorities and Information) Regulations 2015.
Its about time the CTSI was informed of every issue with this set up, and if someone chooses to go to the IAS the CTSI should be informed of their failings, as all it does is bring the CTSI into disrepute.From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
And when the Odious IPC weasels came on scene all talk of an independent scrutiny board was flushed down the toilet.
and to top it all they are claiming this on their so called appeals page:
Its about time the CTSI was informed of every issue with this set up, and if someone chooses to go to the IAS the CTSI should be informed of their failings, as all it does is bring the CTSI into disrepute.
One of the biggest failings is the IAS do not name their assessors. The UK Government ADR 2015 quite clearly states that the assessors must be named.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
So I presume that the legal requirement still applies therefore when the likes of Thieves and co go to debt collectors/Mcol you have a get out in that the rules have not been followed.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards