Who's invested in Cryptocurrency
Comments
-
-
The thing is I still can't say I understand what cryptocurrency is and I cannot see any definitive way of ascertaining its value. There've been some discussions on this forum on around three or four threads with, it seems, opposing views in equal measure: there's the "don't touch" camp on the one hand with the "best thing since..." brigade on the other. Both arguments have validity.
But the point is what exactly is this stuff. The underlying technology makes sense. It streamlines processes, makes them more efficient, decentralised, etc. but the resulting coins are simply a by-product, are they not? Eg. the bitcoin blockchain is a way of confirming transactions, so it has a significant and practical application. But the bitcoins themselves are the by-product, the reward to miners for carrying out the confirmatory transactions. Why should those resulting coins have value? That bit is the bit I'm struggling to grasp.
Those debating on both sides of the fence will probably agree that the technology is the future and they will also probably agree that current valuations are spurred on by the usual herd behaviour seen in previous bubbles throughout time. But what is hidden in a grey area is the true value of the currencies and that is what nobody can agree on because nobody can know or foresee the real world true value or be sure it even exists.
By investing we are merely taking part in an unknown the result of which we won't know for a while, the length of time too also unknown.
I've written this post to address the question at the start - we know there is an underlying technology but what exactly is the value of the cryptocurrency it generates which itself is only a by-product of that technology?0 -
....but what exactly is the value of the cryptocurrency....
Every "cryptocurrency" is different in some way, and there are more than 2000 of them.
Take Ethereum and its Coin ETH.
If you want to use the Ethereum blockchain then you need some ETH coins.
If you think Ethereum is going to be a huge success and used for say storing all NHS records or legal contracts. Then the limited number of ETH coins will be in high demand, hence the value of ETH will rise.0 -
Well I would say i'm getting there in my understanding but am a long way from completing that journey. However I have invested in the last few days and started a blog detailing the journey. http://ineptinvestor.blogspot.co.uk/
Hopefully it will be informative, well a bit anyway !
Come along for the ride - personally i'm quite worried that I will lose my small gamble on this but sometimes the only way to find out how something works is to give it a go !Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
hildosaver wrote: »That's cool - we will just continue to make crazy gains while you sit and do that.
Yep, because that bubble is never going to burst, is it? :wall:
Would anyone like to invest in my new tulip bulb enterprise?0 -
hildosaver wrote: »That's cool - we will just continue to make crazy gains while you sit and do that.
If you're making "crazy gains", then in the zero sum game that cryptos are then someone else is making crazy losses0 -
If you want to use the Ethereum blockchain then you need some ETH coins.
If you think Ethereum is going to be a huge success and used for say storing all NHS records or legal contracts. Then the limited number of ETH coins will be in high demand, hence the value of ETH will rise.
If I understand you correctly, what you are saying is that if the NHS wanted to make use of the Etherium blockchain to store all of its records it would need to pay for this service using Etherium coins. Is this correct?0 -
If you want to use the Ethereum blockchain then you need some ETH coins.
If you think Ethereum is going to be a huge success and used for say storing all NHS records or legal contracts. Then the limited number of ETH coins will be in high demand, hence the value of ETH will rise.Eco Miser
Saving money for well over half a century0 -
The thing is I still can't say I understand what cryptocurrency is and I cannot see any definitive way of ascertaining its value.
- What is an ounce of gold worth?
- A bit of copper wiring?
- A bag of flour?
- An old painting?
- A bag of sand?
- A piece of slightly sharpened wood that a hominid made 10,000 years ago?
- A piece of thin polymer that the Bank of England wrote £5 on?
- A number on a screen which says you have a certain amount in your bank account, but in reality, your bank does not have funds that match everybody's balance, they play with your money and lend it to others at interest, and you trust them because if you ask for your money in a cash machine, you know they will give it to you?
- A piece of paper with "I will pay $200, signed <signature>"?
- A solution to an algorithm that a warehouse full of specialised computers spent a lot of electricity and time calculating and that millions of other computers around the world verified and agreed it was valid?
- A token of which only 200,000,000 will ever be made and somebody told you will be used for some amazing purpose in the future?
Some of these items are finite resources that will run out or become much harder to obtain in the future. Some involve work to obtain. Some are unique and can never be made again. Some are fungible (in that any unit is identical and interchangeable). Some can simply be "printed" whenever it is deemed politically necessary.the resulting coins are simply a by-product, are they not? Eg. the bitcoin blockchain is a way of confirming transactions, so it has a significant and practical application. But the bitcoins themselves are the by-product, the reward to miners for carrying out the confirmatory transactions. Why should those resulting coins have value? That bit is the bit I'm struggling to grasp.
Of course, at the moment Bitcoin barely functions as a currency due to the poor decisions of a group trying to centralise and control it. But other cryptocurrencies are trying to take on the same vision of being a decentralised currency where people are in control of their own money.
Then you have cryptocurrencies that are trying to do something on top of that, such as those that seek to provide smart contracts (Etherium, NEO).
Other cryptocurrencies issue tokens in ICOs, purchased with ETH or NEO, and those tokens might then be used on whatever service they provide when their product launches, but until then the price is really just speculation on the fact people think it will be good, rather than because there is any useful product.
Others try to use blockchain technology (the idea of a distributed immutable ledger that everybody agrees on) to offer other services, such as file storage, or use it in audit trails for whatever reason.
Others, such as Stellar, are trying to solve problems of transfer from one commodity to another, functioning similar to credit, and if they realise their dream, you would be able to exchange any currency (or asset) for any other to someone on the other side of the world almost instantly and at virtually no cost.
The truth is, the vast majority of projects are garbage, many are simple cash grabs where someone or some people create a website, put their pictures on it, write a document, and use buzzwords to claim they're solving all the problems of dentistry, or publishing, or casinos. Maybe some of them even will, who knows?
But where we're at now is basically like how in Britain in the 1840s everybody and their dog was opening a railway company and promising to build a track, and everybody and their cat was rushing to buy shares in it. A lot of the railways never got built, a lot of them were abandoned, and we now have a fraction of the track that we had then, although railways are still important. The same will happen when the bubble bursts on crypto. All the shitcoins will fall away, and we'll be left with a big few players.
Personally I think people should read the whitepapers, and understand them, so that they know what it is they are "investing" in, rather than just seeing the green lines and greedily throwing money at it in the hopes of becoming rich in 5 years. Although in reality, you could have invested in pretty much any of the major cryptocurrencies last year and become rich this year. But mass adoption is usually when the bubble bursts, so when my hairdresser or taxi driver is asking me about it, I get worried.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards