We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: PPI complaints down, but payday loan gripes soar, says Ombudsman
Former_MSE_Helen
Posts: 2,382 Forumite
Complaints about Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) have halved, while those about packaged bank accounts have risen...
Read the full story:
PPI complaints down, but payday loan gripes soar, says Ombudsman

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
PPI complaints down, but payday loan gripes soar, says Ombudsman

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
Comments
-
They should ban complaints from claims handlers, also fine them for wasting timeDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
I wouldn't ban them, people are entitled to use intermediaries if they wish, but would require them to make an up front payment of say £500 for each case submitted. If the complaint is upheld this is refunded, if not then it is forfeited. I would also regulate the level of their charges to their clients. A maximum of 5-10% would seem more than reasonable rather than the 20-30% which is often quoted on this site.0
-
but these fishing claims are stopping genuine complaintsDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
-
-
Alpine_Star wrote: »How come?
In the last year 62% of PPI complaints were genuine, which is a higher uphold rate than the average of other products, so if anything it's the volume of genuine complaints which is the problem.
But again that means 38% are not genuine, thus clogging up the system and the delay would be around 1/3 shorter if people weren't sending in fraudulent and incorrect complaintsSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
But again that means 38% are not genuine, thus clogging up the system and the delay would be around 1/3 shorter if people weren't sending in fraudulent and incorrect complaints
And I don't believe that figure includes the ones that firms reject as no PPI and dont get referred to the FOS. Our compliance company says that around half the PPI complaints dont have PPI. That is without some stupid CMC then referring it to the FOS.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
But again that means 38% are not genuine, thus clogging up the system and the delay would be around 1/3 shorter if people weren't sending in fraudulent and incorrect complaints
It wouldn't be much of a statutory complaints resolution service if they upheld 100% of complaints would it?
Given the mass mis-selling of PPI the FOS is remarkably efficient. By comparison the small claims court service only manages to resolve 3%-4% of all civil disputes and the win/lose ratio is lower at approximately 50-50.0 -
Howso, At the open day, whilst no fan at the mo, it was intimated the early payday loan customers were 'confused', to put it nicely I was genuinely taken aback to hear that and so walked out after an hour, this service was a joke in 2011/2012 when an insider of the PDL industry even later admitted this was the time they were all at their worst!! so I can only think there is some reason why there is a lot of extra compensation going on... all it has done is been sure to cause more friction... will they acknowledge the word short term loan ever, if I ever have to refer I won't be saying payday loan!
Interesting how none of the payday loan cases made it into official literature... what do we expect from ex. bankers!! yes it was one insightful day...
Wonder if the legal ombudsman is having impact? is that as corrupt.0 -
an up front payment of say £500 for each case submitted?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456K Spending & Discounts
- 248K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.9K Life & Family
- 263.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
