We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Connection and disconnection

brianposter
brianposter Posts: 1,678 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
I have a phone in a rural area which is used for about six months a year and is consequently connected and disconnected regularly.

Thirty years ago this was no problem - one simply rang and the engineer came along and connected or disconnected at his convenience.
In more modern times it has appeared that connection and disconnection has been done remotely, simply by typing something into a computer.

However when I have expressed an interest in changing to another supplier whilst the line is disconnected the spectre of "sending an engineer" has reappeared.

What exactly does happen in a rural exchange when a line is connected or disconnected ?
«1

Comments

  • mattyprice4004
    mattyprice4004 Posts: 7,492 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The same thing as in any other exchange - if no physical work is needed (as is the case a lot these days) they simply remotely turn your line off.

    When you move provider to an LLU provider (or to non-LLU from LLU) an engineer will need to physically move the connection from one set of equipment to another for you.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And the cost will be the same regardless of whether an engineer visit is required or not.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • brianposter
    brianposter Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    However if they tell me that an engineer is required when this is untrue, surely I have a simple legal case to recover the connection charge.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    No, because the charge is the same for a reconnection or connection regardless of whether an engineer visit is required. The engineer can normally reconnect at the exchange or street cab. They will only visit the property if there is an issue at that end-which is why they ask for access to be made available on the day. It's impossible for them to know in advance if that visit is necessary or not.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • Buzby
    Buzby Posts: 8,275 Forumite
    You can only ever transfer a working line. Other firms may not be as laid back as BT and any non-working period will result in the line (and number) being returned to its original owner (BT).
  • brianposter
    brianposter Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    macman wrote: »
    No, because the charge is the same for a reconnection or connection regardless of whether an engineer visit is required. The engineer can normally reconnect at the exchange or street cab. They will only visit the property if there is an issue at that end-which is why they ask for access to be made available on the day. It's impossible for them to know in advance if that visit is necessary or not.


    That is the interesting point. I have been specifically told that the charge is for a visit by an engineer but I get the impression that what actually happens is that Openreach charge a fee for reconnection even if an engineer is not required.
    Obviously misrepresenting the charge would be deceitful.

    It is clearly possible to find out whether an engineers visit is necessary and it would be very foolish not to do so - you do not send an engineer a hundred miles or more just to waste his time.
  • brianposter
    brianposter Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Buzby wrote: »
    You can only ever transfer a working line. Other firms may not be as laid back as BT and any non-working period will result in the line (and number) being returned to its original owner (BT).

    Why ?

    In my case , as far as I know, there is no practical problem.
  • Myser
    Myser Posts: 1,908 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Are you having an Infinity service installed?
    If my post hasn't helped you, then don't click the 'Thanks' button! ;)
  • brianposter
    brianposter Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Myser wrote: »
    Are you having an Infinity service installed?

    No. I would not have expected Infinity to be available.
  • iniltous
    iniltous Posts: 4,056 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 19 June 2013 at 11:39PM
    If you ask a provider to cease your service the line plant from the exchange to your property is available to be used for other provision or repair work in the area, so if a neighbours line developed a fault, part of your 'old' connection could be used to repair that line, leaving your property without a complete connection back to the exchange... in that situation it wouldn't be possible to just switch the line back on, it would need some engineering involvement to restore service,
    It has become the case that requests for service, lines that only need to be started or lines that have to be provided from scratch are dealt with the in the same way.
    An intact line could be brought into service without a visit, the end user will probably get a text stating ' we dont need to call', in other cases even though a socket exists in the property significant work may be required to provide a working line, the assumption is if there no dailtone at the socket a 'new' line is required, even if the only work is in the exchange
    The charge for the 'provide' in lots of cases is absorbed or reduced by the service provider in return for a longer than usual minimum term or by taking a bundle of services,
    The exception to this is where a working line is taken over by a new provider, so is never in a ceased state, in that case the new provider should only charge a takeover fee, but with so many providers too chose from even if the socket has dial tone, when you call a provider, they may not locate any record of that line, especially if the line is LLU'd and offer a 'new' line at whatever cost they charge for a provide instead of a takeover
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.