We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: TalkTalk fined £750,000 for silent and abandoned sales calls
Options

Former_MSE_Helen
Posts: 2,382 Forumite
in Phones & TV
"TalkTalk has today been fined £750,000 by regulator Ofcom for making an excessive number of abandoned and silent calls..."
Read the full story:
TalkTalk fined £750,000 for silent and abandoned sales calls

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
TalkTalk fined £750,000 for silent and abandoned sales calls

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
Comments
-
Bring back capital punishment for gross infringement of public interest. Bankers that cost the tax payers billions obviously should be publicly executed.
Mass nuisance cases should also have the marketing VPs be tortured by headphone fed by inane sales recordings for days. Feed them water but denied food until they die.
Companies will buy key-man insurance, so that they can compensate widows and children of dead VP and headhunt costs for the next VP.0 -
O well i am sure they will put up prices to pay for the fine0
-
-
these types of calls should be banned. 3% is to many0
-
TalkTalk has been fined for something it did two years ago. It breached the level of Silent Calls permitted under Ofcom's own policy.
In 2006, Parliament stated to Ofcom that "We expect you to use your powers to eradicate the nuisance of Silent Calls."
Instead, Ofcom has drawn up a policy that tolerates a certain amount of Silent Calls. Ringing someone up and hanging up without saying anything is wrong. It is a misuse of the telephone network and Ofcom should regard it as such.
Ofcom permits the use of Answering Machine Detection (AMD). This 'listens' to see if it can hear the clicks and whirrs of a mechanical answering machine. In so doing there must be a period of silence at the beginning of the call during which it listens. The detection technology isn't exact and in some case it 'thinks' that a human is an answering machine, which means it terminates the call. This is one cause of silent calls.
However, mechanical answering machines are pretty-much extinct. Answering services are invariably network based. What should happen is that Answering Service Detection (ASD) is used. This would be far more accurate.0 -
They should be fines for all their junk mail too. Vicious selling techniques too and not competitive at all.Be ALERT - The world needs more LERTS0
-
They also own most of the phone lines that doctors use for the premium rate 0844 numbers that were banned three years ago, but continue in use in over 1000 surgeries.Businesses using 084, 087 or 09 numbers will soon need to display details of the inbuilt Service Charge under Ofcom's "unbundled tariffs" plans.
Businesses using 084, 087 or 09 numbers for customer service, complaints, renewals, etc, will need to swap to an 01, 02, 03 or 080 number before the Consumer Rights Directive comes into effect June 2014.0 -
Did they have any response?If you fold it in half, will an Audi A4 fit in a Citroen C5?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards