📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Benefits 'may be linked to pay, not inflation'

"Benefits may be linked to average pay rather than inflation, according to reports ..."
«1345

Comments

  • And rightly so. Seems bitterly unfair that those on low pay see their pay frozen or tiny increases whilst those on benefits see 5%+ rises. It encourages the wrong kind of behavior.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • working
    working Posts: 213 Forumite
    Common Sense at last.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    edited 18 September 2012 at 1:16PM
    What a great motivation for government to encourage businesses to keep wages low. Don't raise wages because the benefits bill will increase, yet all of the ignorant sheep bleat "Yes, great idea, at last." Stupid, stupid people.
  • I think it's shareholders who encourage businesses to keep wages low, not the Government.
  • BigAunty
    BigAunty Posts: 8,310 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Haven't they tinkered before with what benefits were tied with and how benefit increases are calculated?

    I seem to remember reading that if JSA had kept pace with some other kind of tracking system, it would be worth £120 a week now instead of £71. Can't remember what it was linked with though, such as cost of living or inflation or whatever.

    Having said that, a person on NMW wouldn't be too happy with job seekers earning around 60% of what they do for a 35 hour week.
  • foofi22
    foofi22 Posts: 2,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Morlock wrote: »
    What a great motivation for government to encourage businesses to keep wages low. Don't raise wages because the benefits bill will increase, yet all of the ignorant sheep bleat "Yes, great idea, at last." Stupid, stupid people.

    Not sure what talking sheep have to do with this.

    Yes, great idea, at last
  • And rightly so. Seems bitterly unfair that those on low pay see their pay frozen or tiny increases whilst those on benefits see 5%+ rises. It encourages the wrong kind of behavior.
    Like eating proper food, heating your home in the winter, making sure your children are clothed, you're right, truly awful behaviour.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    alinwales wrote: »
    I think it's shareholders who encourage businesses to keep wages low, not the Government.

    A combination of both, but this policy would give more motivation for the government to intervene. Tories would like to see the minimum wage scrapped, whilst Labour have discussed introducing a living wage. A sum which more realistically reflects the cost of living. The government play a huge role in the level of wages.
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    foofi22 wrote: »
    Not sure what talking sheep have to do with this.

    Yes, great idea, at last

    Baaaaahhh!
  • Fair enough. People on NMW often don't have a rise every year (unless the NMW is increased). Don't see why it should be any different for those on benefits.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.