We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

House Price (Non) Crash 1

I complain about the number of 'Crash!' threads as much as anyone, but there's some interesting reading on the FT site.

Article here re their survey of economists for 2007:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2ffd2ece-99c3-11db-8b6d-0000779e2340.html

"Most of the rises in the rebounding housing market are now viewed as sustainable by three-quarters of economists in a reversal of the position two years ago, when the same proportion viewed a housing crash as posing a serious threat to the economy."

The full survey results are here:
http://media.ft.com/cms/08d0a5fa-99c4-11db-8b6d-0000779e2340.pdf
Pages 32-38 cover the detail of the views on the housing market.

Just thought I'd throw this one into the mix on here... A little like throwing petrol on a BBQ. :)
«13456

Comments

  • mystic_trev
    mystic_trev Posts: 5,434 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks for a bit of balance Sarah...however todays Mail.

    Property price panic

    Henry Pryor, founder of one of the UK's biggest property websites, says a rush of sellers among home owners who believe the boom has passed its peak is threatening to produce a glut that will push prices down.

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/mortgages/house-prices/article.html?in_article_id=416087&in_page_id=57&ct=5


    Personally I can't see it. The current market looks very strong and I think they'll be more HPI until the end ot the year.

    House price crash is now cancelled until 2008!
  • "Most of the rises in the rebounding housing market are now viewed as sustainable by three-quarters of economists in a reversal of the position two years ago, when the same proportion viewed a housing crash as posing a serious threat to the economy."

    So, the economists have a history of being wrong then!

    :)

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • Henry Pryor, founder of one of the UK's biggest property websites, says a rush of sellers among home owners who believe the boom has passed its peak is threatening to produce a glut that will push prices down.

    Where will they live now. BTL market to boom! Caravan sales take off.

    :rotfl:

    :)
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,113 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So, the economists have a history of being wrong then

    Actually yes they do.
    Here's a whole load of wrong predictions.

    https://www.housepricecrash.co.uk
  • sarah_elton
    sarah_elton Posts: 2,017 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So, the economists have a history of being wrong then!

    :)

    GG

    Well, to quote The West Wing, "economists were put on the Earth to make astrologers look good". :)

    Still, their comments are a mixture of predictions, and I just found it refreshing to read different perspectives. This forum can read a little like Daily Mail Readers Anonymous some days.
  • Alan_M_2
    Alan_M_2 Posts: 2,752 Forumite
    lisyloo wrote:
    Actually yes they do.
    Here's a whole load of wrong predictions.

    https://www.housepricecrash.co.uk

    Damn, I didn't realise that site was populated by economists, I thought they were general members of the public having a chat on a forum just like this one:confused:
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A crude calculation taking the average UK house price for the Nationwide HPI as £172,065 and the average m/f couple income being £487 and £387 p/w each being £45,448 between them gross shows that the price of a house is about 398% of the average income, currently. If we increase each at their current rate (9.3% p.a. for the house and 4.1% p.a. for the income) we get an average house price of £500k after 12 years with an income of £73,600 (house is 680% of income).

    Going further, in 20 years a house is worth in excess of £1mio while the income to buy it is £101,500 (1004%). Indeed in 50 years (hopefully within the life of a 30 year old buyer, at least the non-smoking female ones) the average house price is a little over £14.5 million with the average earnings being a little under £340k. A house is worth 4332% of the average earnings - a lifetime's gross income.

    This suggests to me that either house prices have to rise at a lower rate or incomes at a higher one. I don't see what will drive wages to rise much more strongly than they do at present. This suggests to me that if I buy a house for my son today, he'll be independent from ever having to work. Or that house price inflation must slow or go into reverse.

    This suggests to Mrs Generali that I should get out more but the point is made. Waddaya think?
  • Alan_M_2
    Alan_M_2 Posts: 2,752 Forumite
    The FT article is very interesting indeed, if you are interested I'd urge you to read the full version not the headline version. It gives a very interesting insight into how these people think.

    Also it reads from a global perspective rather than particularly a UK only perspective with the single most cited concern on our economy being a freefall in value of the USD.

    Good interesting read, that comes across as neither bullish or bearish but somewhat in the middle.
  • talksalot81
    talksalot81 Posts: 1,227 Forumite
    lisyloo wrote:
    Actually yes they do.
    Here's a whole load of wrong predictions.

    https://www.housepricecrash.co.uk

    You may joke, but I think in so doing you show a level of ignorance.

    Many of those who would laught at HPC.co.uk are finding themselves with enormous mortgages with the very real threat of rising repayments due to interest rate rises and the threat of market slowing because of affordability issues.

    While HPC has to date been wrong and many still do not own their own property, it is full of reasoned arguements which are strictly correct. The arguements to the contrary are almost entirely unable to give fundamental explanation of how the market continues to be strong and how it can be sustained (read affordability).
    2 + 2 = 4
    except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.
  • Alan_M_2
    Alan_M_2 Posts: 2,752 Forumite
    Generali wrote:
    A crude calculation taking the average UK house price for the Nationwide HPI as £172,065 and the average m/f couple income being £487 and £387 p/w each being £45,448 between them gross shows that the price of a house is about 398% of the average income, currently. If we increase each at their current rate (9.3% p.a. for the house and 4.1% p.a. for the income) we get an average house price of £500k after 12 years with an income of £73,600 (house is 680% of income).

    Going further, in 20 years a house is worth in excess of £1mio while the income to buy it is £101,500 (1004%). Indeed in 50 years (hopefully within the life of a 30 year old buyer, at least the non-smoking female ones) the average house price is a little over £14.5 million with the average earnings being a little under £340k. A house is worth 4332% of the average earnings - a lifetime's gross income.

    This suggests to me that either house prices have to rise at a lower rate or incomes at a higher one. I don't see what will drive wages to rise much more strongly than they do at present. This suggests to me that if I buy a house for my son today, he'll be independent from ever having to work. Or that house price inflation must slow or go into reverse.

    This suggests to Mrs Generali that I should get out more but the point is made. Waddaya think?

    I think extrapolating figures in that manner really doesn't prove anything, either way and doesn't forecast anything happening in reality.

    If you told someone in the 1970's that their £10,000 house would be worth £100,000 10 years later they'd have told you that you were bonkers, but we went through a phase of staggering inflation and that did in fact occur, but at what cost socially?

    There is an imbalance between perceived value of property and income which needs to be addressed reasonably soon otherwise a sharp correction could occur, which really does no one any good. The current increase in house prices continues to be fuelled by the ability to borrow (along with low rates enabling the borrowing) - as long as these two things continue to be in existence I see no correction.

    It isn't inconceivable that prices increase a further 10% during 2007, then again it also reasonable to suggest they could go in the other direction, lets face it, neither would exactly be a shock would they?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.