We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Benefits and Bank Charges ???

Hi, I just put in a new claim for my bank charges going back 6 years, 94% of the bank charges were taken from JSA, IS and/or Child benefit, Charges were taken for amounts of £80.00 for an Unauthorised Overdraft to £105.00 for an unpaid DD, which ...again, put me in the red..... The charges i have claimed for total nearly £3,000 I am currently on JSA and (I think) in financial difficulty. will any of this make any difference to my claim in respect of the waiver ???

Thanks..:confused:

Comments

  • I am also on benefits and have read somewhere previously that the banks are not allowed to take fees from benefits as they are based on how much you can live off. I was wondering if there is another way to reclaim the fees that have been taken from benefits. Does anyone know anything about this?
  • Orford
    Orford Posts: 2,199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The two Acts of Parliament that govern how benefits are paid are the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Tax Credit's Act 2002. Both of these have clauses which apparently make it unlawful for banks to impose bank charges on benefits:

    Social Security Administration Act 1992 Section 187:
    187.—(1) Subject to the provision of this Act, every assignment of or charge on–
    (a) benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act; [3(aa) a jobseeker’s allowance;]
    (b) any income-related benefit; or
    (c) child benefit,
    and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void;
    Tax Credits Act 2002 Section 45:
    45. Inalienability
    (1) Every assignment of or charge on a tax credit, and every agreement to assign or charge a tax credit, is void;
    HOWEVER by 'charges' they DO NOT MEAN BANK CHARGES. What is meant is things like attachment of earnings and charging orders.

    Although there is some ambiguity, if you took a case to reclaim bank charges to court based on s187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 or s45 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 the court would almost certainly find against you.

    No one is saying that the banks have the right to take money from benefits, only that you can't use the Social Security Administration Act 1992 or the Tax Credits Act 2002 to stop them. Money taken from benefits is unlawful - but unlawful by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 and the common law on penalties in contracts , not under the Social Security Administration Act 1992 or Tax Credits Act 2002 (unfortunately).
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.