We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Pension rules back in 1992?
Tight_Fart
Posts: 77 Forumite
What would the pensiom rules regarding taking cash back in 1992 have been, same as today 25%
My pension would be due to repay a £50k mortgage but I'm wondering if it ever could have?
My pension would be due to repay a £50k mortgage but I'm wondering if it ever could have?
0
Comments
-
Yes it was. Trouble is future investment performance is unknown at the point of inception of the plan.0
-
What would the pensiom rules regarding taking cash back in 1992 have been, same as today 25%
No. Back then you had plans that could pay different amounts to 25%. Such as no tax free cash at all, or 3 times the annual annuity. Or hybrid plans that could be as high as 100% tax free lump sum.
2006 saw a lot of standardisation but plans from before then could get transitional relief that allowed them to keep any amount more than 25%. Whilst plans with less or no tax free cash got uprated to 25%.My pension would be due to repay a £50k mortgage but I'm wondering if it ever could have?
If a personal pension was used, then it would have been 25%. If an EPP was used, it could have been different.
Pension mortgages did need the premiums to continue and be increased over the years to keep on track. A lot of them failed to see the people increase the premiums in later years.0 -
Thanks, I’ve never seen the policy document as it went direct to Barclays as security.0
-
Tight_Fart wrote: »Thanks, I’ve never seen the policy document as it went direct to Barclays as security.
Who was the provider? Different fee charging structure back then.0 -
No idea, I think it would have been before the days that that was even spoken about.0
-
Tight_Fart wrote: »No idea, I think it would have been before the days that that was even spoken about.
Aliied Dunbar (aka Crowbar) were notorious even back then. Though one had to financially literate to be in the know so to speak. Many people were ill informed and therefore gullible.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards