How long do large companies keep employee records for?

Options
I'd like to apply for work at a local branch of a medium/large national chain, but around 13 years ago I was fired (techincally...) from a different branch. My name is now different due to marriage - if I apply again, are they likely to pick up on the system that I have previously worked for the same company, perhaps from my national insurance number? Would it be normal to keep something like that for 13 years?



(I actually resigned from the position, which was only a few hours per week, after falling suddenly ill and having to leave the city for treatment with no idea if or when I would recover. A month later I got a letter saying I had been fired for gross misconduct (i.e. failing to come to work)! At the time I wasn't in any state to argue with that, and just let it go.)

Comments

  • General_Grant
    General_Grant Posts: 4,840 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    See if they ask about your work history. Do they ask for information from that far back?
  • tante
    tante Posts: 28 Forumite
    Options
    I'm not sure, I haven't applied yet as the process is to go into the store and hand in your CV, by the look of it... my normal CV wouldn't include employment this far back but I'm not sure what they ask about on their internal forms.
  • General_Grant
    General_Grant Posts: 4,840 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    You don't have much (anything) to lose by taking that CV in.

    However if they did go on to ask for information as far back as 13 years, do tell them. You would presumably also have a gap between then and when you began work again.
  • tante
    tante Posts: 28 Forumite
    Options
    Do you think they will actually still have a record from then? I'm conflicted, I wouldn't want a potentially embarrassing situation if I was to be hired and then HR came across my 'firing' details when putting me on the system... but then again, it doesn't seem wise to bring something up from years ago that could jeapordise my application if they might not even have the details!
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    Options
    We couldn't possibly know. They perhaps ought not to have records that old. But who knows - apart from them? Companies shouldn't have blacklists either, but some do. Some keep records of people they wouldn't employ or re-employ. Whether this one does, we couldn't know. They are hardly likely to advertise the fact - blacklists are illegal!
  • Tigsteroonie
    Tigsteroonie Posts: 24,954 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post Photogenic
    Options
    It's an interesting question, as under the new GDPR employers have to have compelling reasons for retaining records of ex-employees beyond six tax years after the end of their employment ... But I suspect not many employers have addressed this matter yet.

    I do have to say that your previous employment would probably be picked up, as most payroll systems will only allow a single record per NINO (to avoid duplication of tax records) - presuming that they have retained the same payroll system.
    :heartpuls Mrs Marleyboy :heartpuls

    MSE: many of the benefits of a helpful family, without disadvantages like having to compete for the tv remote

    :) Proud Parents to an Aut-some son :)
  • DigForVictory
    DigForVictory Posts: 11,906 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary Photogenic First Post
    Options
    It's a punt on "have they updated their accounting &/or payroll in the intervening years". So long as you are ready for a *possible* chat with HR, I'd go for it.
  • foxy_squirrel
    Options
    I am pretty certain they would have your name somewhere on the system. Your national insurance number would flag it up. Just be honest. 13 years ago is a long while. On your CV I would only go back 5 years anyway.
  • shortcrust
    shortcrust Posts: 2,697 Forumite
    Combo Breaker First Post First Anniversary Newshound!
    edited 16 August 2018 at 9:26AM
    Options
    It's an interesting question, as under the new GDPR employers have to have compelling reasons for retaining records of ex-employees beyond six tax years after the end of their employment ... But I suspect not many employers have addressed this matter yet.

    I do have to say that your previous employment would probably be picked up, as most payroll systems will only allow a single record per NINO (to avoid duplication of tax records) - presuming that they have retained the same payroll system.

    Ensuring that employees fired for gross misconduct are not offered future employment would seem to me to be a compelling reason to keep the records.
  • AstroTurtle
    AstroTurtle Posts: 290 Forumite
    edited 16 August 2018 at 9:19AM
    Options
    shortcrust wrote: »
    Ensuing that employees fired for gross misconduct are not offered future employment would seem to me to be a compelling reason to keep the records.

    Agreed. OP it's near enough 100% they will still have a record of you on their system/papers or even employee's working their may remember you.

    13 years ago sounds like a long time but that was only 2005, lots of systems companies use for staff management and payroll existed then and are still used today. Odd's of most employers cleaning them out because of GDPR? Slim.... Especially if they have retained gross misconduct notes incase they were worried about any tribunal action.

    Doesn't make it right but doesn't help you really.

    Also to whoever said they would only put 5 years experience on a CV, I would want a lot more than the last 5 years if I was hiring someone and leaving a gap like that would raise questions.


    In relation to record keeping and GDPR, It depends on their lawful basis for processing that data. Chances are during the first 3-6 years they will adopt the Legal Obligation defence for retaining records but that doesn't mean after that they delete it all. They would just adopt a new defence of it's a legitimate interest of their business to retain the records for prevention of future hiring, lawsuits etc etc. OP would then need to argue that their interests override that of the company for example.

    Again NONE of this has been tried and tested in a court under GDPR yet so it's a guessing game till then.
    Save £12k in 2019 -
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 247.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards