We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Confused regarding re-assessment ! approaching would have been ex employer for job
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
Yeah I was remembered
was offered job direct back with employer, under different job title/call centre
0
Comments
-
They won't be thinking about your leaving nearly as much as you are.
You started work for them before, left because of the offer of a permanent job that didn't work out and are now applying again. All perfectly reasonable.But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0 -
What is "would have been ex employer"?Don’t be a can’t, be a can.0
-
What is "would have been ex employer"?
Had I lasted longer then a certain period of time, the intentions were apparently we'd have been transferred over to the company as direct employees, but yeah I get your point
Just want to be prepared for how they might word it as there were both agencies and direct staff first time around to a HR who may or may not necessarily be fully in the picture or be aware of how I was recruited (if at all of course)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
