We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
IVA/DMP query
Leixlip1
Posts: 372 Forumite
A general enquiry really - having had a lightbulb moment (or was it a floodlight) I have started the process of trying to obtain an IVA. However, since contacting my creditors to inform them of this several have written to me offering to freeze interest, accept reduced pro-rata payments etc.
If I wite a "without prejudice" letter to my creditors giving a SOA and details of pro-rata payments, and then chose not to proceed down the self-managed DMP route, would my actions have an adverse effect on my still running IVA application?
Any advice, comments welcome. Just have this nagging feeling I may have been pointed down the IVA route too quickly - but I've been wrong in the past!
If I wite a "without prejudice" letter to my creditors giving a SOA and details of pro-rata payments, and then chose not to proceed down the self-managed DMP route, would my actions have an adverse effect on my still running IVA application?
Any advice, comments welcome. Just have this nagging feeling I may have been pointed down the IVA route too quickly - but I've been wrong in the past!
0
Comments
-
why not post your SOA and see what people think here.0
-
hi Leixlip1,
Your right to propose an IVA will not be damaged by first trying to reach an informal agreement with your creditors. On the contrary, some creditors have recently been vocalising concerns of an increase of occasions where their first knowledge of clients being in financial difficulty is when they receive the IVA proposal from an I.P. and would have preferred to attempt an informal arrangement first, so don't worry about that aspect.
I personally have assisted hundreds of clients into IVAs from failing DMPs, allowing them to benefit from the advantages an IVA can bring over a DMP, but it is not always the better option. Your personal circumstances and point of view will determine what action is most suitable.
With regards to the speed with which you were advised to try the IVA route, sometimes the decision as to whether an IVA is the most suitable solution of all option available can be straight forward, so the speed with which the adviser arrived at the decision my not be an issue. What is of more concern to me is that the adviser has failed to explain their decision clearly enough for you to be in agreement with it. Without understanding the decision, how could you be comfortable with it.
The decision as to what course of action you should follow remains yours, and even if you are best advised on paper to propose an IVA, you should only do so if you are comfortable with it.
My advice would be to take a second, and even a third opinion. Ask for all your possible options to be clearly explained, with both the pros and cons of each option being pointed out in detail. It will be only then that you will be able to assess your own circumstances and decide on which option you are most comfortable with.
I hope this helps.0 -
Thanks for the advice - will be taking further advice tomorrow from CCCS & National Debt-Line.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards