Moriarty Law/ JC International - Send Help!

Hello, wondering if anyone could help me.

In Jan 2012 I took out a 12month minimum term contract with Talk Talk. In June 2013 so outside of my minimum term I moved to Sky. I rang talk talk to cancel (you had to give 30 days notice) but apparently they have no record of this. Sky began providing my telephone and broadband services from July 2013. Sky gave me a new telephone number which meant that as of July 2013 the subject matter of the talk talk contract ceased to exist.


Now my memory is hazy as its been almost 6 years but I seem to remember talk talk couldn't accept our relationship was over and continued to charge me a direct debit. The last one was taken November 2013. I seem to remember claiming the wrongly taken DDs back via a direct debit indemnity at the time. I am unsure of how this works and whether the refund would have come out of talk talks pocket or my own banks.


Since then a few debt collectors chased me in the intervening years but all backed off when I told them my tale.


Fast forward to July 2018. I received a letter from these moriarty law people who said I had a contract with talk talk up until Sept 2014 (15months after i moved!) and were threatening me with a ccj for £324.72!! And we have been playing a game of letter tennis ever since.


First they sent me a copy of talk talks terms and conditions and pointed me to a clause 10.4.2 which stated cancellation of a broadband contract had to be in writing and asked me to provide proof of my having written to cancel. I responded by helpfully directing them to clause 10.5 which related to the termination of the contract which stated that ending the contract could be done via the phone. I also contacted talk talk to confirm that cancellation could be done by phone.


Then, after a couple more tennis rounds I told them the subject matter of the contract ceased to exist in July 2013, they asked me to provide proof of this so I sent them my sky bills.


The latest letter off them says they have sent the evidence back to their client, they will contact me again on receipt of further instructions and "in the meantime, the account will remain on hold and collection activity has been suspended".

Are they likely to come back to me now? I'm worried because I can't prove I made a phone call to them other than the fact that Sky have been providing my services since July 2013. From my knowledge of contract law the fact the subject matter of the contract ceased to exist means in any event the contract became frustrated and therefore void. Also does anyone know at what point this would become statute barred? I left in Jul 13 but they were still taking dds until Nov13 which I claimed back but reckon I had an account with them until Sept 14!!!

Talk talk have not provided any service to me since Jul 13. Absolute clowns. I would love to see what they think they have been billing me for. Obviously if they checked my "account" they would see no phone calls or internet downloads since I left and went to sky?