Retrospective changes to pension
Options
Comments
-
brewerdave wrote: »You will probably find that the Trustees are under significant pressure from the parent Company to minimise future Company contributions:(
That is likely to be true - but it isn't a justification for bending under pressure, unless there are good reasons to do so (pleasing the employer isn't one of them).0 -
Silvertabby wrote: »Most public sector pension schemes (including OP's Civil Service) switched from RPI to CPI for both pre-retirement and pensioner members from April 2011.
My principal DB scheme made the same switch even though it is not a public sector scheme. It turned out that although the leaflets over the years had always chattered about RPI-linking, the scheme rules specified linking to inflation in the same way as for ... civil servants I think it was. Naturally the rules governed what happened.
If anyone my age were to tell me that if he'd known about the difference between the rules and the leaflets he'd never have joined the scheme I'd tell him he was lying. It's annoying but those of us who didn't read the rules have only ourselves to blame for being surprised.
EDIT: come to think of it we could blame the union for not warning us but that would be the height of hypocrisy since everyone acknowledged that the union was utterly useless on anything to do with pensions (and on most other things too).Free the dunston one next time too.0 -
Out of interest
PCS union still offers its own staff a RPI based pension increase !!0 -
If you have taken an ill health retirement under age 55, I am surprised you expect to live to 1000
-
-
That is likely to be true - but it isn't a justification for bending under pressure, unless there are good reasons to do so (pleasing the employer isn't one of them).
...but if there is a shortfall in the "pot" (which is highly likely with most DB schemes) the trustees have to agree to a schedule of extra contributions made by the parent Company to fill/close the gap - probably politically easier to achieve if future liabilities have been reduced by changing from RPI to CPI!0 -
-
BT are currently going through the courts on this one, they lost in the high court and are now going to appeal. Very strange for a pension to do this before the BT case is done and dusted.
Whatever ruling is final given in this case it does not set any precedent for any other pension scheme. The case refers to section C pensioners, those like myself on sections A & B have already been switched to CPI.
Each pension scheme will have its own rules, and its the interpretation of the interpretation of those rules that is at the heart of this case.0 -
I stand as much of a chance of making my ton as anyone else !!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-44107940
Your poit about RPI/CPI still stands but 100 is optimistic.0 -
but 100 is optimistic.
A relative of mine has PoA for a lady now in her 97th year - she recently received a letter from the friend who was her bridesmaid mentioning four acquaintances who'll make the "ton" this year....
One of our parishioners visits a former neighbour who recently chose to go into a residential home at the age of 105.....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 247.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards