We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

LGPS Early Retirement Wannabe

Hi all, Some advice/opinions welcomed on my current retirement plans.

I am 55 with 32 years service and contributions to the LGPS. I earn just over £36K per year. My wife is 56. She currently has 18 years contributions to the LGPS, but she took voluntary severance on 31st July 2017, and has no plan to return to work. She takes a pension of £9K a year from a previous employment, which will reduce to about £2400 when she hits SPA at 67, but then her SP will kick in and she will get around £7800 from that. She has deferred her LG pension, as it would be reduced by about 35% for taking it early.

Like many parents our age, we have been the bank of mum and dad the last 10 years getting our son through uni and just recently helping him and his girlfriend buy their first house. We have never been able to save for ourselves until the last year when we managed to save £6K. Now I am thinking it's time to start thinking about us, and after 36 years of work with no breaks already I can't bear the thought of doing this past 60!

We are mortgage free, so that helps a great deal. We live in the North East of England where house prices are relatively low, and we live in a 3 bed semi, so downsizing and moving to a cheaper area isn't an option as part of the plan.

Originally I was thinking of putting £600 a month into the Prudential LGPS AVC, but my wife is particularly risk averse, so I agreed to just put £300 a month in and make the £60 a month tax saving, and save £250 a month in a savings account, so we have a rainy day/house/car pot.

If I work until 60 that then gives me a forecast pension of around £18K a year, a £30K TFLS from LGPS and another £18K +/- profits/losses in the AVC, which I believe I can also take tax free in with my LGPS TFLS. If I am correct, I will have 85 rule protection on my pension accrued up to 31st March 2008?

My plan would be to draw down about £6K a year from my £48K ish TFLS to add to my £18K pension to take me to 67 when my SP kicks in. My wife will continue to take her £9K pension, and possibly pay into a SIPP for the tax advantage. She will defer her LGPS pension as long as possible to minimise the reduction.

Does all of this sound sensible? Have I missed something? I thought I read somewhere that if you deferred like my wife you still accrue service that counts for the 85 rule. So for instance my wife left her job aged 56 with just under 18 years, so doesn't qualify. However, if she defers just over 6 years she will be 62 and have 24 years, so will qualify. Maybe an LGPS expert on here could advise? I know only her 1999-2008 service would be covered, but better than a poke in the eye!
«134

Comments

  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,562 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 4 January 2018 at 1:07PM
    If I work until 60 that then gives me a forecast pension of around £18K a year, a £30K TFLS from LGPS and another £18K +/- profits/losses in the AVC, which I believe I can also take tax free in with my LGPS TFLS.
    Yes, as long as your automatic lump sum (from your pre 2008 service) plus your AVC is less than 25% of the value of your combined pension/AVC benefits. There have been rumblings that HMRC will put a stop to this tax break, but nothing definite yet.
    If I am correct, I will have 85 rule protection on my pension accrued up to 31st March 2008?
    Yes
    I thought I read somewhere that if you deferred like my wife you still accrue service that counts for the 85 rule. So for instance my wife left her job aged 56 with just under 18 years, so doesn't qualify. However, if she defers just over 6 years she will be 62 and have 24 years, so will qualify. Maybe an LGPS expert on here could advise? I know only her 1999-2008 service would be covered, but better than a poke in the eye!
    Yes. Just be careful if your wife, for whatever reason, decides to work/re-join the LGPS - if her benefits are combined, the gap in between won't count towards the Rule of 85.
  • bioboybill
    bioboybill Posts: 3,517 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks, Silvertabby. Glad my understanding of the 85 rule was correct. ��

    I would still welcome any opinions as to whether my plan seems reasonable, and whether there may be some things I've missed.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,562 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Actual advice is outside my remit, I'm afraid. Hopefully someone else will pop up with some ideas.
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,918 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'm no financial expert but that Pru AVC tax break is very generous imo. You get 20% relief added and can take it all as a tax free lump sum so long as it doesn't amount to more than 25% of your full pension benefits! I'm putting as much as I can into mine!
  • bioboybill
    bioboybill Posts: 3,517 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes, I'm hoping those tax breaks stay, and will look to up contributions further when I can.
  • lazyred
    lazyred Posts: 18 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Out of interest why did your wife get VS instead of VER? I thought you could draw the LGPS without reduction after redundancy over 55.
  • OldBeanz
    OldBeanz Posts: 1,439 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Your wife is earning less than her tax free allowance so you can either transfer £1k of her allowance to her or pay £2880 into a SIPP then withdraw £3600 each year after the Government has added in 25%.
  • bioboybill
    bioboybill Posts: 3,517 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    lazyred wrote: »
    Out of interest why did your wife get VS instead of VER? I thought you could draw the LGPS without reduction after redundancy over 55.
    Yes, according to the rules you are correct, and I pointed that out to my union at the time. However, what our employer did was that they asked those applying whether they would accept the deal with a reduced pension, or whether they wanted payment of an unreduced pension. They made it clear that if the extra cost of an unreduced pension was more than the severance payment you would be refused. Hence my wife accepted the severance on the basis of a reduced pension and was allowed to go. Everybody asking for the unreduced pension they were entitled to was told they were "critical to the business" and refused.
  • bioboybill
    bioboybill Posts: 3,517 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    OldBeanz wrote: »
    Your wife is earning less than her tax free allowance so you can either transfer £1k of her allowance to her or pay £2880 into a SIPP then withdraw £3600 each year after the Government has added in 25%.
    Yes, that's part of my plan. :D
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,562 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    “ Out of interest why did your wife get VS instead of VER? I thought you could draw the LGPS without reduction after redundancy over 55.
    Originally posted by lazyred
    Yes, according to the rules you are correct, and I pointed that out to my union at the time. However, what our employer did was that they asked those applying whether they would accept the deal with a reduced pension, or whether they wanted payment of an unreduced pension. They made it clear that if the extra cost of an unreduced pension was more than the severance payment you would be refused. Hence my wife accepted the severance on the basis of a reduced pension and was allowed to go. Everybody asking for the unreduced pension they were entitled to was told they were "critical to the business" and refused. Posted by Bioboybill

    This was becoming more common as at the time I retired a couple of years ago.

    The employer costs due in respect of an unreduced pension at 55 (bearing in mind that OP's wife wouldn't have any R85 protections then as 55 + 18 = 73) would have been very substantial.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.