We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Money Moral Dilemma: Should I complain about a prize that's worth less than was advertised?

MSE_Kelvin
Posts: 385 MSE Staff

This week's MoneySaver who wants advice asks...
I was lucky enough to win a gas barbecue worth £400, along with some food to go with it, in an online competition. Yet I was sent a lesser model, worth £300, and only about half the food. Should I contact the website to complain, or should I be grateful for what I've got?
Unfortunately the MSE team can't answer Money Moral Dilemma questions as contributions are emailed in or suggested in person. They are intended to be a point of debate and discussed at face value. Remember that behind each dilemma there is a real person so, as the forum rules say, please keep it kind and keep it clean.
If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.
Got a Money Moral Dilemma of your own? Suggest an MMD.


0
Comments
-
Normally the T&Cs says if prize unavailable then a substitute of equal value will be chosen. You could ask why they did not supply the prize as advertised, but not sure how far you are going to get with a complaint."We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein1
-
In the past I have occasionally won a competition and received a prize which was notably less in value than the one in the comp post. For example, I won a 43" television but received a 40" one and although I did wonder if it was worth complaining, I emailed a polite request to ask for confirmation that I had received the correct prize. In response the company apologised for sending the wrong tv and gave me the option of sending back the 40" and receiving the 43", or keeping the 40" and getting a Canon Powershot camera to make up the difference (I took the camera). Another time I only received 2/3 of the amount of wine I should have been sent and again after a polite email query the remainder of the prize was promptly sent, with apologies. However, I never got a small prize of beer and glasses and despite numerous emails there was no response. I would think that if you have not got all of a large value prize that you should have received it is worth politely querying this, particularly if you have to hand the competition details and terms and conditions which describe the proper prize.8
-
I don’t think you need to complain, just send them an email to say ‘have I got the correct prize’, ‘am I missing some of prize’.2
-
Morally I think it’s fine to complain when what you’ve been sent is worse than what was promised. Even though it was free to you, that doesn’t make it a gift.4
-
I would certainly query the prize.1
-
MSE_Kelvin said:This week's MoneySaver who wants advice asks...I was lucky enough to win a gas barbecue worth £400, along with some food to go with it, in an online competition. Yet I was sent a lesser model, worth £300, and only about half the food. Should I contact the website to complain, or should I be grateful for what I've got?
What I'd do after they answer really depends on a number of factors like if the competition was free or paid for, if the later how much, who is running it etc. I mean if our local tombola for the local orphan charity said the top prize was a fine bottle of whisky and they gave me a bottle of Jamesons then I'd probably accept it. If however I paid £100 with one of those car raffles and was supposed to get a brand new Aston Martin but they give me a Ford Puma instead then I'd be challenging it.2 -
Agree. A polite email enquiry would be a good starting point.
Too many people don't do what they say they will do nowadays for whatever reason.1 -
Why is this a 'dilemma'? You won a specified prize and received something of demonstrably lower value. Why wouldn't you query it?Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!5
-
My personal feeling is that, even if you didn’t pay to enter this competition (which I’m guessing you didn’t as you don’t mention this), the company should have honoured their side of the bargain. However, they clearly didn’t. If I were you I would definitely point out to them, politely but firmly, that this was not the prize they advertised and that you are not happy. I think they are being both unfair and also very cheeky. They shouldn’t be deceiving people in this way. After all, where do you draw the line? For example, if someone enters a competition to win a swimming pool they wouldn’t expect to receive a child’s paddling pool as a substitute!1
-
I would check the Ts and Cs to see if it states the exact prize or if an alternative of equivalent value (which this isn't would be provided).
Won so far in 2017: ipad mini :j1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards