I read about an app that allows you to buy discounted food from supermarkets that would otherwise be thrown away. I thought this was a great idea, so I downloaded and started using it. My local deli was on it and I bought £12 worth of food for just £4. But then I started to think that, while I'm not rich, I'm hardly poor, so should I be using this app or leaving it so there's more available to those who are struggling?
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site feedback for updates.
Money Moral Dilemma: Is it OK to use a surplus food app even though I'm not struggling?

MSE_Kelvin
Posts: 375 MSE Staff

This week's MoneySaver who wants advice asks...
Got a Money Moral Dilemma of your own? Suggest an MMD.
Unfortunately the MSE team can't answer Money Moral Dilemma questions as contributions are emailed in or suggested in person. They are intended to be a point of debate and discussed at face value. Remember that behind each dilemma there is a real person so, as the forum rules say, please keep it kind and keep it clean.
If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.


0
Comments
-
I think it’s fine as there’s no guarantees that someone who really needs the food would actually get it and actually waste food sharing is not the answer to structural poverty. I’d consider what you can do to help people less fortunate though by paying your savings forward or volunteering your time 😊MFW 2021 #76 £5,145
MFW 2022 #27 £5,300
MFW 2023 #27 £2,000
MFW 2024 #27 £6,055
MFW 2025 #27 £550/£500014 -
The point of the app is to reduce food waste, not save you money. The side effect being that you save money too, is just an added bonus. I don't think you need to feel guilty about it; there's no guarantee that anyone who needed the cheaper food would get it or indeed, want it. I would carry on doing what you are doing and consider making a donation to your local food bank if you feel so inclined...19
-
Nothing wrong with saving money - just because someone is poor does not mean they will be using the app.
2020 Wins:
3 -
I use Olio. A lot of the food people don’t want such as bags of salad ends up being donated as animal food. I saw someone the other day, taking taking 3 crates full of bags of salad and loaves of bread to feed the goats with because there was too much surplus for the number of people.
its purpose is to reduce food waste. Nothing more, nothing less. I have no qualms about requesting items, even though I’m not on the breadline.The OP is referring to something like the “too good to go “ app. Which I don’t use because I tried it a couple of times and got a load of food that I didn’t want and couldn’t freeze. But that is the luck of the draw. If you’re on the breadline you probable need to know what you’re getting and not just hope that it’s something that you would eat and have space for.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.9 -
I think the Too Good To Go app is about reducing food waste and helping a business reclaim some of the costs instead of being a total loss. OLIO is supermarkets reducing waste. You’re actually both benefiting. Food banks are completely different and donations from others as a form of charity donation which only eligible people should be using5
-
Too good to go is about avoiding waste, and it's also a bit of a lottery. Some bags are great, one I put straight in the bin. It's not about the cost of living. It's been going for ages and it's for everyone.
Olio is also about avoiding waste, but as the stuff is free I tend to leave it for others.
Food banks and our local community fridge? I wouldn't dream of taking what is for those in need.7 -
You may take perishables. The ones in my area don’t. I asked that question before using the Olio app.We will have to agree to differ on whether I am selfish or not.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.16 -
It's fine. The aim of these apps are to reduce food waste. Charities know the apps are available and should use they but they don't. yeo don't. The refore the argument is moot if the charities will not take the food available or if the people struggling do not like what they find. I personally don't waste food and if what I want has a yellow sticker I will buy it.1
-
I had a similar dilemma last night. Went in shop 30 mins before closing. 3 loaves of reduced bread. I thought they would be thrown out so bought 2, froze 1 but left one for someone else.5
-
If we're talking about an app like "Too Good to Go" then I don't see the problem. I use one every couple of weeks or so, usually local artisan bakeries or sometimes our local Dobbies which has a small Sainsburys instore....I am on a good wage as is my partner so we don't have to worry too much about the cost of groceries normally. Apps like that are a bit of fun, you're saving food from being wasted and you're not getting it for free, just very discounted because it is so close to its end of shelf life.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 241K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.7K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards