We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What made you 'pull the trigger'?

Options
145791033

Comments

  • I took partial retirement in August last year after 41 years and then got wind of the possibility of a VES scheme and got all excited - but then I thought I’d probably get next to nothing as my 60th birthday is coming up in February so I would be at NPA - for Classic at least. Although I’m now in the Alpha scheme so maybe they would treat my NPA as 67. Anyway the thought was nice while it lasted….
    There was a lot of discussion about this a couple of years ago and I think it was confirmed that if in the Alpha scheme at the time of redundancy/early release then the NPA would be 67 and the rules applied as such. Not sure how widely it was publicised and I certainly didn't see anything from official channels.

    The "package" boat sailed for me last August when I retired. The numbers added up for me and there was no real sniff of redundancy in the air so I decided you can't put a price on those extra years retirement.

    I know a couple of people in a similar situation who are still hanging on hoping for things to change. But as I understand it the HMRC site where I used to work, which is a transitional site in the HMRC Superstore Project and due to close in 2025, now looks like it might be extended. For their sake I hope things change and they get their package, particularly with NRA of 67, but there will be no regrets from me at all.       
    Hi @germ@german_keeper - if Alpha NPA was the defacto in any VES/VER scheme I would be very happy although I’m
    not sure how much I would get as a) I’m effectively part time, b) partially retired and c) perhaps have too many years in (41). I did try reading the guidance but couldn’t make head nor tail of it.  I shall keep my fingers firmly crossed 🤞 Hope you’re enjoying retirement - I’m finding 2 and a half days is good for me and although happy to be flexible in terms of flipping the odd half day here and there my management seem to have grasped that if they send me anything (or invite me to a meeting) on a Monday, Thursday afternoon or a Friday then I simply won’t respond.
    I was PR for about 3 years and it was great, those 4 day weekends. And manged to arrange my hours so that I was just below the abatement threshold and so about £100 per month better off. I love being retired, whether the gradual nature of full time, PR and then fully retired helps I'm not sure but I think I can see the logic in it.

    Regards VES/VER, assuming NPA does prove to be 67 I think you would be entitled to 21 months. Current rules are 1 month per year of service with a max of 21 months. PT just reduces the service, a bit like in the old final salary schemes, with FTE earnings used. Compulsory redundancy is max of 12 months but voluntary has to be offered first.

    New scheme, which was knocked back in a judicial review a few years ago, was 3 weeks per year of service with a max of 15 months and still 12 months for compulsory I think. Also not sure if voluntary had to be offered first. It was only really knocked back on a technicality, due to lack of consultation, and they launched a consultation a while back so I assume if large scale redundancies are planned they would probably try and get it through. Keep them fingers crossed!! 
  • Sus59
    Sus59 Posts: 76 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Ciprico said:
    I was going to retire In December at 60... Then thought I might as well wait till spring... At spring I'll probably find another excuse...

    I can afford to retire but can't seem to find it in myself to just pack in a reliable, well paid, working from home, cushy, dull job.


    This sounds familiar. I'm 63 and working from home. Have just cut down to working 4 days a week.
    What nobody has mentioned is loss of benefits when retiring. I get paid for private health insurance for myself and subsidised for my partner as well as cheap travel insurance which covers pre-existing conditions.
    Having been treated for cancer in 2021 made me realise that life is short and I should retire, but I'm reluctant to lose the benefits and the salary and pension contributions although I probably have enough to retire on.


  • I was PR for about 3 years and it was great, those 4 day weekends. And manged to arrange my hours so that I was just below the abatement threshold and so about £100 per month better off. I love being retired, whether the gradual nature of full time, PR and then fully retired helps I'm not sure but I think I can see the logic in it.

    Regards VES/VER, assuming NPA does prove to be 67 I think you would be entitled to 21 months. Current rules are 1 month per year of service with a max of 21 months. PT just reduces the service, a bit like in the old final salary schemes, with FTE earnings used. Compulsory redundancy is max of 12 months but voluntary has to be offered first.

    New scheme, which was knocked back in a judicial review a few years ago, was 3 weeks per year of service with a max of 15 months and still 12 months for compulsory I think. Also not sure if voluntary had to be offered first. It was only really knocked back on a technicality, due to lack of consultation, and they launched a consultation a while back so I assume if large scale redundancies are planned they would probably try and get it through. Keep them fingers crossed!! 
    Hi @german_keeper if that was the case I think I’d be lighting a candle in church never mind keeping my fingers crossed!
  • Sus59 said:
    Ciprico said:
    I was going to retire In December at 60... Then thought I might as well wait till spring... At spring I'll probably find another excuse...

    I can afford to retire but can't seem to find it in myself to just pack in a reliable, well paid, working from home, cushy, dull job.


    This sounds familiar. I'm 63 and working from home. Have just cut down to working 4 days a week.
    What nobody has mentioned is loss of benefits when retiring. I get paid for private health insurance for myself and subsidised for my partner as well as cheap travel insurance which covers pre-existing conditions.
    Having been treated for cancer in 2021 made me realise that life is short and I should retire, but I'm reluctant to lose the benefits and the salary and pension contributions although I probably have enough to retire on.

    I also lost a fully paid company car, and it was a bit of a shock to the system to pay for one myself.
    On the other hand I do not have to drive up and down the M1, M6 etc unless I am going somewhere I want to go.
    To a large extent, these benefits are there to stop you leaving, for exactly the reasons you say.
    You do realise that those are taxable benefits…. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.