We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
lump sum or higher pension
Samelsie
Posts: 6 Forumite
How should I decide if i should take lump sum and lower pension or higher pension? Commutation is £15 for each £1 sacrificed. I won't be paying higher rate of tax
0
Comments
-
If you have any debts to clear, then taking a lump sum could be one way to do this. If not, what will you do with the cash that would make it a sensible decision to take cash rather than pension?0
-
How old are you? How would it affect your widow's pension?Free the dunston one next time too.0
-
To buy that £1 pension could very well cost say £35 so only accept £15 if, for whatever reason ,you really need £15 now.
Don't take the £15 and just invest it.0 -
How much income do you need? How much of that income is required from this pension? Including for your spouse should s/he survive you? If possible, all expenses, and definitely non-discretionary spends, would be covered by guaranteed income (SP/DB/annuity).
Assuming expenses are covered without taking your DB entirely as income, do you have other assets/pension pots/cash to cover debts/emergencies/one-off capital spends?
Answering these kinds of questions will help you to decide whether to commute and, if so, how much.
Personally, I would only commute to the level that I needed the cash.0 -
Commuting part of your pension is just that - your pension (not any pension payable to a surviving spouse/partner/eligible child).
Could you clarify? Surely any spouse/dependent pension will reduce proportionately if OP commutes? Most couples include the needs of the survivor in pension planning. I wouldn't want Mr DQ to be on his uppers if I die first, nor vice versa.0 -
Not in my experience - as Brynsam says - it's your pension that is being swapped for cash - not your widow(ers) benefits - they remain the same as if no commutation had taken place. But DYOR.DairyQueen wrote: »Could you clarify? Surely any spouse/dependent pension will reduce proportionately if OP commutes? Most couples include the needs of the survivor in pension planning. I wouldn't want Mr DQ to be on his uppers if I die first, nor vice versa.
I'd add in the mix that I believe the lump sum is tax free, but as a pension, is taxable - so your tax status going forward will affect your calculations, too.0 -
Could you clarify? Surely any spouse/dependent pension will reduce proportionately if OP commutes?
If the LGPS is taken as an example, from their fact sheet
Will my Survivor's Benefits be lower?
If you decide to commute your annual
pension to lump sum, it will NOT reduce
any subsequent Survivor's Benefits
payable to your spouse, registered civil
partner or nominated co-habiting partner,
and/or eligible children in the event of
death.
Or Shell
Your surviving Qualifying Spouse will be entitled to 60% of the
pension you received when you took your pension, but before
adjustment for any PCLS taken and allowing for increases to the
pension between the member's retirement and death.0 -
Now, that's interesting. Thanks for the tip folks.
I need to check the small print of Mr DQ's scheme. It has a tasty 2/3rds widow's pension but he believes that this will reduce proportionately if he commutes.
Does anyone know whether the unreduced widow's/dependant's pension is a common benefit of private sector schemes?0 -
I recently took my LGPS. I had deferred pension which became payable at age 60. I was under the assumption that the commutation rate was 12 to 1 and had worked my calculations on that basis and had decided to take minimum tax free lump sum and max pension. When I got the proposal it was a commutation factor of over 19 to 1 simply because of the specific time I was in the scheme. As a result I took the maximum tax free lump sum without affecting any future pension for my wife should anything happen to me. I figured on the basis above it was more beneficial to me to take increased tax free lump sum. At a commutation rate of 12 to 1 I would not have done it. At 15 to 1 it depends on personal circumstances - in my case I would probably have still taken the minimum - but we are all different with different circumstances, needs etc0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
